Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

War on Fat Gets Serious - From statehouse to courtroom
LA Times ^ | January 3, 2004 | Melissa Healy

Posted on 01/03/2004 4:29:09 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

Margo Wootan, of the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Science in the Public Interest, says that at the end of a decade in which obesity rates have risen 50%, the time has come for government activism in the fight against fat. Excess weight and obesity contribute to the premature deaths of 300,000 Americans annually — not far behind tobacco's yearly death toll of 430,000.

Fat is the fastest-growing cause of disease and death in the United States today, and that has set off alarms bells in every quarter of government, Wootan says.

"We'll see more," she predicts — more litigation, more debate and more lawmaking, from Washington on down to local school boards. Americans, she contends, will welcome the help. "Most people want to eat better, but they find it difficult."

Your new fat-fighting allies plan to wield a few sticks — carrot or otherwise — as well. After all, if fat is the new Public Enemy No. 1, then those who do not join the fight (and who cost the country $117 billion per year in additional health-care costs) may need more inducement to get on board.

In the brave new world that public health activists hope to create, you would pay a special tax on Ho Hos, Big Macs and other foods high in fats or sugar. An obese person would pay more for health insurance than someone of appropriate weight and would have no legal recourse if passed over for a job because of their weight. And your favorite junk food would return to the test kitchen to have its fat removed because its manufacturer would be worried about being sued.

And everywhere you would turn for a bite, whether at restaurants or at home, you would see fat and calorie counts and consumer warnings. Imagine, in small type, something like, "The surgeon general has warned that excessive consumption of foods high in fat and calories will lead to obesity, which is associated with increased risk of diabetes, heart disease and certain kinds of cancers."

If the warning sounds familiar, it's no coincidence. Lawyers, lawmakers and activists determined to reduce obesity have modeled their campaign on the nation's anti-tobacco crusade — a nearly 40-year effort that has helped drive down smoking among American adults from about 42% in 1965 to about 25% today.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: antifatbigotry; diet; fat; foodpolice; health; nannystate; nutrition; obesity; pseudoscience
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Margo Wootan, of the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Science in the Public Interest, says that at the end of a decade in which obesity rates have risen 50%, the time has come for government activism in the fight against fat.

Does that mean we all get free liposuction like Nadler did?

He's the three one in the middle.
41 posted on 01/04/2004 3:14:35 AM PST by RandallFlagg ("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
Free?
42 posted on 01/04/2004 3:17:32 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
And, what's that growth on his left shoulder? Hope it's benign.
43 posted on 01/04/2004 3:20:48 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
Free?

Why not? If it's for "The children"..../dripping disgust

And, what's that growth on his left shoulder? Hope it's benign.

Like a tarantula...
44 posted on 01/04/2004 3:24:04 AM PST by RandallFlagg ("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
Did he get it done at Bethesda or Walter Reed or Free because he is a fat congresscritter?
45 posted on 01/04/2004 3:28:20 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
And, what's that growth on his left shoulder? Hope it's benign.

Sorry, it's been biopsied and it's malignant.

46 posted on 01/04/2004 3:29:54 AM PST by jalisco555 ("The right to bear weapons is the right to be free" - A. E. Van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
Oh, I have no idea where. Do a FR search for "Nadler" and see what it turns up (warning -graphic photos on almost every Nadler thread).
47 posted on 01/04/2004 3:31:18 AM PST by RandallFlagg ("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
...pay a special tax on Ho Hos, Big Macs...

They'll have to pry my Ho Hos from my cold, dead fingers.

48 posted on 01/04/2004 3:32:30 AM PST by jalisco555 ("The right to bear weapons is the right to be free" - A. E. Van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555
LOL. Actually I had meant to type, "Hope it's not benign."

Really, I did.
49 posted on 01/04/2004 3:32:39 AM PST by leadpenny (I'm not inept, I'm ept!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
That's ok. Thanks anyway. The photo you posted is graphic enough in more ways than one.
50 posted on 01/04/2004 3:35:26 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
Great picture. It looks like H.R-C. finally figured out how to make her butt look smaller.
51 posted on 01/04/2004 3:48:20 AM PST by Quiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Black Birch
But I thought you said you didn't mind being crammed in if it made the flight cheaper for you.

With the fattening of society, if the obese, not wanting to pay for two tickets just because they overlap the purposely shrunken airline seats, are kicked off flights, there will be less people flying, which will result in higher fares.

52 posted on 01/04/2004 4:56:17 AM PST by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
But I thought you said you didn't mind being crammed in if it made the flight cheaper for you.

I don't mind being crammed in. Most obese people can fit in an airline seat. The ones that can't are extremely obese. I don't remember the exact figures, but people in that class are just a few percentage points of the population. It won't make that much difference to ticket prices.

53 posted on 01/04/2004 7:31:07 AM PST by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson