"What do Islamic terrorists and Democrats have in common?"

New Conservative Revolution ^ | 25 December 2003 | N.C.R.

[Lando Lincoln]

"What do Islamic terrorists and Democrats have in common?" 12/25/03

Both were opposed to the overthrow of Saddam Hussein

Both support the overthrow of George W. Bush

Both were elated by a crippled U.S. economy

Both are now disgusted by our new economic turnaround

Both are opposed to the 'nativity scene' and other religious aspects of Christmas

Both are sympathetic to Hamaas as opposed to Israel

Both hope Bin Laden is never captured or killed

Both have control over their respective media outlets and education systems

Both believe that government is supposed to control thought

Both hate big business and wealth

Both are too stupid and uneducated to acquire wealth

Both hate the American military

Both wish Christians were silenced

Both are allies of France and Germany

Both are concerned with how Saddam is treated while in captivity

Both have been getting their ass kicked lately by President Bush!

Who would Bin Laden vote for if he could cast a ballet in the upcoming election; George Bush or Howard Dean?

[Lando Lincoln]

Lando

[Support Free Republic]

Rank	Location	Receipts	Donors/Avg		Freepers/Avg		Monthlies
2	New York	195.00	4	48.75	669	0.29	288.00	17

Thanks for donating to Free Republic!

Move your locale up the leaderboard!

[bulldogs]

I want a T-shirt

[Viking2002]

In the final analysis, both are suicidal cowards.

[vetvetdoug]

Both condone buggering.

[skinkinthegrass]

an guess...Mrs. William Jefferson Blight Clinton/Hillary Clinton?

[ovrtaxt]

Both have philosophies based on complete BS, documents better used as baby wipes than anything else:

The Communist Manifesto and the Koran.

[chickenlips]

and they both oppose tort reform???

[skinkinthegrass]

better used as baby wipes than anything else:

...good point! :)

[GeronL]

don't worry if Saddam switched parties he'd have some FReeper support.... =o)

[maestro]

International 'Drug' businesses?

[BOBTHENAILER]

Both have been getting their ass kicked lately by President Bush!

A superb post my friend.

[RaceBannon]

On a few website bulletin boards, I have used the term PEACE NAZI to describe the peace movement in general, and one person asked me for an explanation as to what the term means and why I say it. Here is my answer:

It is intentionally derogatory, and I use it because I believe it has to be said.

It has to do with the foundation of the PEACE movement in the US and abroad and their Communist foundation, and how the majority of the signs held and slogans chanted are not about peace or genuine concern for the people of two warring countries, it is about the anti-American attitudes and the violence-inducing signs and slogans calling for violence against American Troops and President Bush.

Carrying signs calling on troops to kill their officers, to bomb Texas, for Bush to choke on a pretzel and die, for troops to shoot their officers, signs that call for communist revolution, starting fights with people who disagree with you while carrying a peace sign, trying to steal my money in Boston while carrying a peace sign and then telling me because you were shamed into giving back the money that means you are ok after all...

Things like that.

I will NOT stop using it. It is intended to make the peace protestor think.

After all the horrors we found in Iraq, you should all be thankful we went in and invaded to remove that madman. Yet, the mantra has changed, it is now against occupation! Still, not one PEACE NAZI has apologized and admitted we were right. All they do is complain that a people that were under slavery for 30 years have gone looting, and who do they blame? Why the US!! We did nothing to stop it! Maybe because we stayed out of the crowd because the PEACE NAZIS would have complained we didn’t let them vent their anger??

(As a side note, people who are now called PEACE NAZIS didn’t call on the LAPD or Federal Troops to stop the LA riots after the Rodney King riots, did they? They told us all to step back and let them vent their anger, yet all of a sudden, we are supposed to go in and use force to stop rioters in Iraq?)

We never intended to occupy a country like SYRIA has the last 20 years, and where are the PEACE NAZIS and their signs calling on SYRIA to leave Lebanon? They are non existent. The Syrians killed tens of thousands, chasing little children into bedrooms and shooting them point blank.

Did you know there was a Christian Community in Beirut before 1985? Now, they are almost either all killed or fled from the Syrian backed Junta, and not a peep from the PEACE NAZIS, only against American forces sent to Beirut to keep peace. Why arent the PEACE NAZIS arguing for the return of the Christian Community back to Beirut where they lived for 2 Millennium?

In fact, there is not a single country that we ever went to war with that we stayed as the government power for more than 10 years! We always returned it to the people.

And that brings up another point: PEACE NAZIS are NOT against war, they are against wars that the US is engaged in to overthrow pro-Communist or PRO-radical Islamic regimes or PRO-Maoist/PRO-Stalinist regimes.

My point here, is simple: These COMMIES are not for peace. If they were, they would have been screaming about Clinton killing innocents to keep his sexual scandals off the tv,

they would have been screaming for the Hutus and Tutsis to make peace,

they would have been screaming for that madman Saddam to stop killing Kurds or Iranians,

they would have been screaming for the Turks to stop killing Kurds or Greeks,

they would have been screaming for the Chinese to stop killing Vietnamese in 1982,

they would have been screaming for the Angolan Army to stop killing with the help of the Cuban Army in the 1980's,

they would have been screaming for the Muslims to stop killing Christians in Indonesia

They would have been screaming for the Sudanese to stop the torture and slave trade which continues today

They would have been screaming when the Syrians invaded Lebanon in 1985

They would have been screaming when Pol Pot started a genocide in 1975,

They would be screaming now about Mugabe killing all the white farmers in Africa in Zimbabwe

They would have been screaming at the murders caused by the African National Congress and their necklacing of prisoners and at Winnie Mandela who was convicted of murder, yet the communists are silent

They would have been screaming about Tiananmen Square, but they are silent.

They would have been screaming about the repression in Cuba and why so many people have chosen to flee in rickety little boats, but instead they lionize that dictator, Castro

They would have been screaming about the invasion of South Vietnam where the north started a genocide campaign in direct violation of the Paris Peace Accords of 1973 and caused over 2 million Vietnamese to flee in little boats that got picked up by ships like mine in 1981

They would be screaming at the Palestinians for their suicide bombings that intentionally target innocent school age children


Except, the only time they scream is when the US is at war against a tyrant who is support by Russia.

And since NAZI is one of the most vile insults you can give someone in our last two generations, I call them PEACE NAZIS, for they are not for peace, they are for war, they are for the overthrow of my country and into communism and anarchy, and they are a violent bunch who base their foundation on lies and the telling of lies and the repeating of lies.

[DannyTN]

Perhaps a better question is "What is the difference between a democrat and a Islamofacist?

....uh.....

.....anything?....

....any difference at all?....

[Dallas59]

Dhimorats are to be made fun of...Islaminazis are to be eliminated.

[scooter2]

In other words, Democrats are terrorists. Great, let's wipe them out too.

[Bud Bundy]

I get such a kick out of these liberals that oppose the war, but support our troops. These are the same folks who spit in the face of Vietnam vets returning home. But now they've seen the focus group results, and observed the overnight polls. So now they support our troops.

[SpaceBar]

I sort of take issue with this one...

"Both are too stupid and uneducated to acquire wealth"

The Clintons, Daschles and Feinsteins are quite well off. Perhaps the operative word "honestly" was omitted.

[middie]

What totally facil crapoola--it's stupidity like that list that adversely affects the credibility of the Right; everything becomes a statement of hatred without any hint of rationality and extremism without thought.

[WhyAreYouDumbAndHateful]

"What do Islamic Terrorists have in common with Liberals..."

1. No, Liberals are not opposed to the overthrow of Hussein. They were just pissed off at Bush for LYING to AMERICA. He said that we were going to war because of WMD. GUESS WHAT, they never found any in Iraq. Guess what we did find, OIL. Guess whose company is being paid to rebuild Iraq, CHANEYS. That isnt fishy at all.

If you people would be more observent, you would notice what happened. Bush just ripped you all off.

He destroyed a country so that he could pay his buddies to rebuild it. He took tax payer money and sent it straigt to his buddies pockets. I dont care how dumb you are, you have to at least understand that much.

2) Support the overthrow of Bush? He wasnt even elected. He was appointed by the Supreme Court. Have you ever heard of a coup? Didnt think so. And to all you idiots that think Gore was the whiney one that filed all the law suits and "wasted tax payer money". Bush filed EVERY single law quit first, look it up.

3) Elated by a crippled Economy? No one likes a bad economy. You know One reason why I dont like this administration? BECAUSE THEY COMPLETELY MESSED UP OUR ECONOMY.

4) We are not upset at all about the economy starting to recover. Keep in mind it isnt close to what it was under Clinton. Furthermore, the economy is screwed to hell, Not because of W. Bush, Or Clinton, or H. Bush. Reagon destroyed our economy with deficit spending, something W. Bush likes quite a bit.

5) Apposed to the religious Aspects of Christmas? I love celebrating the birth of christ every year, it is my favorite holiday. I am against forcing people that are not christian to deal with it though.

6) Liberals are not sympathetic to the Hamaas. I am sympathetic to the fact that we completely abuse the rights of other people. I am sympathetic to the people we kill, and have killed so that we can make more money, consume more oil, and polute more areas.

Furthermore, I think you people need to note that Isreal is the product of the most succesful Terrorist movement ever. A radical religious gourp seizes land, declares it their own, Kills all who challenge this, and imprison the rest. Wait, that is Isreal. Palestinians are not guilt-free either. The terrorist activity MUST stop, however, we must also stop funding and supporting the constant isreali attacks on innocent people.

7) Of course we hope he is captured, he is a terrible person. Maybe if the Government wernt so incompotent they would have cought him a couple of years ago...

8) Liberals have control of the media? Liberals dont have control of the media, nor do conservatives. Giant Corporations have control over it, and whatever makes them more money is what they do. If that means having a Conservative bias (which is the case right now) then thats what they will do.

9) Well, lets see here. Liberals are the ones that support free speach, along with other rights. Conservatives are the ones that try to censor everyone. Furthermore, Conservatives are the ones that try to force christianity on every public school student in the US.

10) You are correct, both do hate Big Buisness. Why? Because they completely erode democracy and are destroying the world we live in.

11) Right, we are to stupid to become wealthy. We are to stupid to rip off the poor. We are to stupid to take advantage of those less fortunate. We are to stupid to destroy the economy we rely on bying making the poor poorer and the rich richer. Ignorance is your game. And you are winning.

12) No, I have profound respect for the PEOPLE in the military, well some of them. Here is the difference between liberals and conservatives. Liberals care about the people in the military and dont want to waste their lives in needless war. Conservatives dont give a shit about those people and will send them off to war for shitz and giggles (but mainly to improve their stock prices)...

13) No, I dont wish christians were silenced. I wish that conservatives would stop MANIPULATING jesus and using him for political ends!

14) Well, technically, we are all allies of France and Germany as American Citizens. I mean, I know you guys dont like people that are different in anyway. I know that you dont like countries that use their minds to solve things peacfuly as apposed to killing everything in sight.

15) Im sorry. I apologize for liberals around the world. I forgot we wernt supposed to care about human rights. Who was it that once said Love thy neighbor...? I think it starts with a J...

16) Both have been getting their "ass" kicked by GW? THat dosnt even make sense. But OKAY.

Bin Laden would prolly vote for Bush, that way he has an excuse to attack more americans. Besides, Bin Laden owes his freedom to Bush anyway.



Wow. I feel sorry for you people. Truly, truly stupid.