Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Suspects revealed al-Qaeda plot to blow up aircraft
The Times (UK) ^ | 1/03/04 | Daniel McGrory and Stewart Tendler

Posted on 01/02/2004 4:33:31 PM PST by saquin

VITAL scraps of intelligence pieced together by British agents revealed how Islamic terrorists were again intent on using aircraft for their next serious attack.

Two suspects questioned by British investigators said that an aircraft leaving a London airport would be part of this new al-Qaeda operation intended to eclipse the death toll in the September 11 attacks. One of these men is understood to have said that the attack was planned for the Christmas and new year holidays.

The revelations came as government eavesdroppers began picking up e-mails from the Middle East referring to transatlantic flights.

Al-Qaeda is desperate to stage another terrorist outrage to prove that it is still capable of orchestrating such a sophisticated and deadly operation, despite recent arrests of some of its most valued organisers.

The suspicion passed to ministers was that terrorists were intending to blow up aircraft packed with passengers returning to America after the holidays over a major city. A British security source said last night: “Such an attack would result in catastrophic loss of life, cause mayhem among travellers and give al-Qaeda the publicity they crave.”

A team of anti-terrorist officers and MI5 agents was ordered last autumn to concentrate on tracking down details of an alleged plot involving aircraft. The team identified one Briton whom they believed was a pivotal figure in this operation. They secretly monitored his telephone calls for weeks, hoping that it would lead them to the mastermind behind the plot and reveal precise details of an attack.

One intercepted conversation mentioned a flight from London bound for America’s East Coast. New York and Washington were seen as obvious targets, though US officials stretched the alert to include other cities such as Los Angeles, Chicago and Miami.

Experts say that the terrorists had three main options. They could again hijack a passenger aircraft and turn it into a flying bomb, although increased security since September 11 made that more difficult.

Another possibility was a missile attack on a fully laden aircraft as it took off and was at its most vunerable. Security officials foiled an attempt by al-Qaeda last year to attack a British holiday flight taking off from Mombassa, Kenya.

Two months ago, Saudi officials uncovered a plot to target a BA flight taking off from Riyadh with a shoulder-held missile. The weapon was found abandoned in a car close to the airport perimeter after a shoot-out with wanted terrorists in the Saudi capital.

However, senior British investigators suspect the most likely option would involve blowing up a number of aircraft in mid-air in a carefully synchronised operation. Richard Reid, a south London petty crook trained at an al-Qaeda camp in Afghanistan, was stopped by fellow passengers on a flight from Paris to Miami trying to detonate explosives hidden in his shoe in December 2001. Since then al-Qaeda operatives have allegedly been developing new ways to smuggle explosives through airport detectors.

Suspects held here and in the United States have told how these “kit bombs” would be assembled on board. Components of the bomb could be hidden in cabin luggage, concealed in shampoo and medicine bottles in a passenger’s wash bag.

Blowing up passenger aircraft in mid-air was a blueprint for al-Qaeda in the early 1990s. Osama bin Laden allegedly vetoed a plan to hijack up to 11 American airliners in the world’s biggest simultaneous hijack and detonate them above the Pacific and Atlantic oceans. The al-Qaeda leader is said to have refined this plan into the September 11 operation, arguing that if there were too many aircraft involved then details of the hijackings were more likely to leak.

Al-Qaeda has a habit of returning to plans that it failed to execute, as it did in attacking the World Trade Centre eight years after members first bombed it.

Extremist websites known to have close links with al-Qaeda have in recent weeks been giving warnings of another imminent attack aimed at embarrassing the Bush Administration.

The difficulty for the authorities is that, as they were uncertain of the exact nature of any attack, they did not know how much of this intelligence should be shared with airlines or travellers.

Kevin Rosser, a terrorism analyst at the Control Risks Group, said: “We are in a world where governments feel they have to act on scraps of information.

“If, God forbid, something terrible happens and then it emerges that governments had information of a risk but did not do anything, they would be exposed politically.”

Mr Rosser explained that it was not possible just to remove suspect passengers and then allow the rest on board to fly, as the suspect might have an associate on the flight.

Increased checks were ordered at UK airports on cargo being flown to the United States in the hold of passenger flights as well as even stricter security for travellers checking in for American-bound flights.

MI5 is said to have received information last summer of the names of two British passport holders who had been recruited for suicide attacks.

The US authorities also claimed that some of those held at Guantanamo Bay had also betrayed crucial information on how aircraft would be integral to al-Qaeda’s next significant strike.

Information from the FBI, CIA and US military intelligence was funnelled into JTAC, the newly created Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre. Set up last June, it includes officers from MI5, MI6, GCHQ, the MoD, police, the DTI and Transec, the security division of the Department of Transport. Within a few weeks of the start of JTAC’s operations Elizabeth Manningham-Buller, the head of MI5, said that the unit was already handling 150 pieces of intelligence a day.

Scotland Yard announced a new level of terrorism alert in November, placing London and other forces round the country on the second highest alert. On December 23 Tom Ridge, the US Homeland Security director, placed the United States on orange alert, the second highest of five alerts used by the American security forces.

Within days officials in Washington began warning airlines around the world that they must toughen up their onboard security and Whitehall officials and police commanders were privately briefed about new American fears of an airborne attack against an American target.

On Monday, the Government announced after discussions with Washington that police marksmen in plain clothes would join selected British flights to the United States as sky marshals. The US began putting pressure on other countries to follow suit.

Washington made it clear that flights would be intercepted or banned from US airspace if there were the slightest security concerns.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airlinesecurity; alqaedastrategy; intellience; mi5; terrorism; threats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

1 posted on 01/02/2004 4:33:31 PM PST by saquin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Interesting...
2 posted on 01/02/2004 4:36:27 PM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Rank Location Receipts Donors/Avg Freepers/Avg Monthlies
7 Wisconsin 101.00
3
33.67
245
0.41
173.00
11

Thanks for donating to Free Republic!

Move your locale up the leaderboard!

3 posted on 01/02/2004 4:36:46 PM PST by Support Free Republic (If Woody had gone straight to the police, this would never have happened!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saquin
. The US began putting pressure on other countries to follow suit.

Washington made it clear that flights would be intercepted or banned from US airspace if there were the slightest security concerns.


Hello world, this is how it's gonna be,
If Momma ain't happy, nobody is happy!
That's just the way it works.
Get used to it.
4 posted on 01/02/2004 4:43:24 PM PST by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Only 2 of out 4 hit their target on 9-11. Washington will be 1st on the list this time.
5 posted on 01/02/2004 4:44:48 PM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; backhoe; HAL9000
Very.

I can't wait to hear this entire story; if we ever hear it, that is.
6 posted on 01/02/2004 4:46:14 PM PST by Howlin (Bush has stolen two things which Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency & the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: saquin
My solution is to remove all Muslims from any such flight, and put them all on a separate flight all to themselves when there's enough for a full plane. Then, only the Muslim flight needs to be shadowed, but closely, by F-16s. It should be allowed to land only at say Raleigh-Durham airport, not DC or New York.
7 posted on 01/02/2004 4:46:37 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Previous post correction....Only 2 out of 4 hit their target. Geez, I hate when I do that!! At my age, it could be series.
8 posted on 01/02/2004 4:46:53 PM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Save to read
9 posted on 01/02/2004 4:50:54 PM PST by WestCoastGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dark Wing
ping
10 posted on 01/02/2004 4:53:38 PM PST by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saquin
Extremist websites known to have close links with al-Qaeda have in recent weeks been giving warnings of another imminent attack aimed at embarrassing the Bush Administration.

Yup. Pretty much a mainstay of the DNC site for the past two years.

11 posted on 01/02/2004 4:53:52 PM PST by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Previous post correction....Only 2 out of 4 hit their target. Geez, I hate when I do that!! At my age, it could be series.

Sorry, it's too late. Your error has been noted, logged, and forwarded to the proper authorities.

12 posted on 01/02/2004 4:56:14 PM PST by NeonKnight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: saquin
We all know that the administration had to take these precautions, not only to save American lives, but because if anything DID happen, the democrats would be out in force claiming "BUSH KNEW!"

I will be so glad when the election is over, perhaps then they will stop trying to trip up Bush and concentrate on trying to trip up the terrorists.

13 posted on 01/02/2004 5:04:55 PM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
My solution is to remove all Muslims from any such flight, and put them all on a separate flight...

My solution is to completely isolate the Middle East countries. No one from those countries can travel to the U.S. No flights originating in those countries can travel to the U.S. This goes for businessmen, family members, diplomats, whoever.

When they get their people in line, they can join the rest of the world. Until then, stay home.

14 posted on 01/02/2004 5:06:28 PM PST by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan
No one from those countries can travel to the U.S.

You are going to let the oil tankers out aren't you?

15 posted on 01/02/2004 5:10:29 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
Great idea, but it wouldn't be fair. Do it anyway.
16 posted on 01/02/2004 5:16:40 PM PST by chiller (could be wrong, but doubt it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
My solution is to remove all Muslims from any such flight

Would you have removed Richard Reid, a mutt of an Englishman? Or Jose Padilla, a Hispanic American? I am sure that Al Quaeda loves to recruit anyone who doesn't look Arab and can fly with a Passport from a non-Muslim country.

17 posted on 01/02/2004 5:17:37 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dog; prairiebreeze; cajungirl
This is at least part of the reason flights have been cancelled.
18 posted on 01/02/2004 5:20:04 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saquin
"The suspicion passed to ministers was that terrorists were intending to blow up aircraft packed with passengers returning to America after the holidays over a major city. "

Two things needed here:


19 posted on 01/02/2004 5:23:47 PM PST by greenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
Remember, I said Muslim, not Arab. That would have got both Reid and Padilla.
20 posted on 01/02/2004 5:24:05 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson