Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Capital Threat; Al Qaeda Concerns Led to Cancellations of London-Washington Flights
ABCnews.com ^ | Jan. 2, 2004 | ABC News

Posted on 01/02/2004 12:38:49 PM PST by Rutles4Ever

Jan. 2 — The decision to cancel some British Airways flights on the London-Washington route in the last two days was based in part on information that a team of al Qaeda operatives planned to take over a flight during the New Year's period and crash it into the U.S. capital, ABCNEWS has learned.

On New Year's Day and again today, British Airways canceled Flight 223 from London's Heathrow Airport to Washington Dulles International Airport, and the return flight from Washington to London was canceled Thursday evening, as terror concerns continue to disrupt international air travel.

The airline announced today it was canceling Saturday's flight, BA263, from Heathrow to Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, for security reasons. It did not elaborate.

ABCNEWS has learned that the cancellations on the London-Washington route were due to information from a "human source" overseas and analysis of other intelligence. The human source, whose credibility U.S. officials have been unable to confirm, said plans were in place to specifically take over Flight 223 and crash it into Washington.

An intelligence source told ABCNEWS that law enforcement officers had been scouring British Airways manifests in recent days.

British defense analyst Paul Beaver also said said intelligence sources told him that Flight 223 has been specifically targeted by terrorists, with the goal being an attack on Washington.

"There seems to be very hard intelligence coming from the United States that there is a serious threat to Flight 223 — the British Airways flight," Beaver said. "It's flight-related, not passenger-related or freight-related. And this is related to something which may be targeted in the Washington area — some sort of spectacular … either flying the aircraft into something or detonating it over Washington itself."

On Wednesday, New Year's Eve, the same flight was kept on the runway for three hours after landing at Dulles while security officials questioned passengers on board. The jet had been escorted to the airport by two U.S. F-16 fighters.

A later London-Washington British Airways flight, BA225, was allowed to make the trip today, with many people from the earlier canceled flight on board.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: airlinesecurity; ba; ba223; ba22e; britishair; flight223; flight233; orangealert4; terrorists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Howlin
where is this one supposed to land?
21 posted on 01/02/2004 1:09:07 PM PST by knak (wasknaknowknid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
ABCNEWS has learned that the cancellations on the London-Washington route were due to information from a "human source" overseas and analysis of other intelligence. The human source, whose credibility U.S. officials have been unable to confirm, said plans were in place to specifically take over Flight 223 and crash it into Washington.

Theory A -- The source is a double agent deliberately feeding false information to economically damage British Airways and undermine Tony Blair. He is very unpopular in the UK, and it would be an excellent outcome for AQ to either weaken Blair or increase frictions between the US and UK.

Theory B -- AQ is testing their security by planting a false stories and checking which version of which story gets leaked. Collateral economic damage to BA or the US/UK relationship is gravy.

22 posted on 01/02/2004 1:46:31 PM PST by Lessismore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
I agree. The newspeople have been restricted. 'bout time.
23 posted on 01/02/2004 4:07:28 PM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
They know something.

Such as? What do you think?

24 posted on 01/02/2004 5:44:06 PM PST by Bella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bella
Hey darlin, hope you and stony had a good Xmas.

Things still surreal here....
25 posted on 01/02/2004 5:47:53 PM PST by Central Scrutiniser (Harry Lime? He is a dirty racketeer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
Why doesn't the US allow these flights to proceed but place several armed marshals on board? I would rather these hijackers get killed in mid-air rather than turned away at the gate in London because the flight was cancelled.
26 posted on 01/02/2004 5:49:40 PM PST by autopsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
BTW, huge huge Ruttles fan, just watched the DVD for about the 95th time.

"very stunned"

27 posted on 01/02/2004 5:49:48 PM PST by Central Scrutiniser (Harry Lime? He is a dirty racketeer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser
Thanks, Hope you had a good xmas and wish you a good New Year!!
28 posted on 01/02/2004 5:53:22 PM PST by Bella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Bella
I think they know a hell of a lot more than we know......imagine if this stuff has come on the radar what they are keeping secret!
29 posted on 01/02/2004 7:11:47 PM PST by Howlin (Bush has stolen two things which Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency & the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I have not checked Fox. I just got home having been gone since 5:00. Checking here first. If the plane is escorted, having been delayed quite a while in Great Britain, wouldn*t*t you get the impression that the danger was from without (missile) and not interior (hijacker)?

Now, I*m going to the news.
30 posted on 01/02/2004 7:34:55 PM PST by jatfla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson