Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Happy2BMe

What would be the effect of an eruption?

Immediately before the eruption, there would be large earthquakes in the Yellowstone region. The ground would swell further with most of Yellowstone being uplifted. One earthquake would finally break the layer of rock that holds the magma in - and all the pressure the Earth can build up in 640,000 years would be unleashed in a cataclysmic event.

Magma would be flung 50 kilometres into the atmosphere. Within a thousand kilometres virtually all life would be killed by falling ash, lava flows and the sheer explosive force of the eruption. Volcanic ash would coat places as far away as Iowa and the Gulf of Mexico. One thousand cubic kilometres of lava would pour out of the volcano, enough to coat the whole of the USA with a layer 5 inches thick. The explosion would have a force 2,500 times that of Mount St. Helens. It would be the loudest noise heard by man for 75,000 years, the time of the last super volcano eruption. Within minutes of the eruption tens of thousands would be dead.

The long-term effects would be even more devastating. The thousands of cubic kilometres of ash that would shoot into the atmosphere could block out light from the sun, making global temperatures plummet. This is called a nuclear winter. As during the Sumatra eruption a large percentage of the world's plant life would be killed by the ash and drop in temperature. Also, virtually the entire of the grain harvest of the Great Plains would disappear in hours, as it would be coated in ash. Similar effects around the world would cause massive food shortages. If the temperatures plummet by the 21 degrees they did after the Sumatra eruption the Yellowstone super volcano eruption could truly be an extinction level event.

19 posted on 01/01/2004 8:43:45 PM PST by Kevin Curry ("When I was growing, we didn't even treat the servants like servants." Andree Dean, Howie's mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kevin Curry
Or it could be a much smaller blast with a continuous weeping of magma, with little or no effect.
34 posted on 01/01/2004 8:49:32 PM PST by Porterville (Every time a liberal speaks an angel is shackled in chains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Kevin Curry
This story misses the good news - the eruption would cancel out "global warming'.
35 posted on 01/01/2004 8:49:35 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Kevin Curry
"Immediately before the eruption, there would be large earthquakes in the Yellowstone region."

Check post #48.

(I'm selling my timeshare outside Yellowstone first thing next week.)

56 posted on 01/01/2004 8:55:00 PM PST by Happy2BMe (2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Kevin Curry
Oh. Stupid me. I thought that a volcanic eruption could NOT cause "nuclear winter," but that only a NUCLEAR event could. Thanks for the information! ;)
58 posted on 01/01/2004 8:55:27 PM PST by mywholebodyisaweapon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Kevin Curry
Volcanic ash would coat places as far away as Iowa and the Gulf of Mexico

I thought this was just an "up north" concern. We can handle ash though. We get that from Mexico when they burn fields:')

64 posted on 01/01/2004 8:58:35 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Kevin Curry
Great post as always, KC...
79 posted on 01/01/2004 9:02:19 PM PST by ServesURight (FReecerely Yours,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Kevin Curry
Yellowstone super volcano eruption could truly be an extinction level event.

Is this why I always see Al Qaeda there with pickaxes and shovels?

82 posted on 01/01/2004 9:03:19 PM PST by Lazamataz (G-d gave us free will. The government took it away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Kevin Curry
You know what's really disturbing? The fact that an eruption of that magnitude would probably neutralize our land and most of our air based nuclear deterrent...
140 posted on 01/01/2004 9:31:43 PM PST by Axenolith (<tag>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Kevin Curry
One thousand cubic kilometres of lava would pour out of the volcano, enough to coat the whole of the USA with a layer 5 inches thick.

That's 5.02 inches for just the continental U.S. or 4.2 inches for the entire U.S. including Alaska and Hawaii and possessions.
198 posted on 01/01/2004 10:11:10 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Kevin Curry
How long ash stay in air? Most ash heavy particle and would fall out with rains. Also prevelent wind pattern determine where fall and where go. Enough grain grown in other areas (Russia) to feed US, plus food stock. Anyway, volcanic ash very very fertile substance.
272 posted on 01/02/2004 12:16:13 AM PST by RussianConservative (Xristos: the Light of the World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Kevin Curry
Im not scientist, but that report is just a little hysterical.

One thousand cubic kilometres of lava would pour out of the volcano, enough to coat the whole of the USA with a layer 5 inches thick.

Give me a break! This is worse than the Y2k reports.

287 posted on 01/02/2004 12:38:03 AM PST by chudogg (www.chudogg.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Kevin Curry
Oh wait, just saw the source, Rense!
289 posted on 01/02/2004 12:39:52 AM PST by chudogg (www.chudogg.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Kevin Curry
"It would be the loudest noise heard by man for 75,000 years"
So is the North Star is 60 light years away.
396 posted on 01/02/2004 8:47:10 AM PST by Zeein (intelligent enough to detect the scientists' guessing game. We are equal in guessing work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Kevin Curry; Sabertooth
Now remember....

All of those things "could be" true.

And then again, maybe not. Just because the worst-case scenario "might" happen, is no guarantee that it "will" happen.

Sure, it's best to be prudent, to be careful, and to have a fallout/fallback/cover-up plan.... Even more important the closer you are to the park.

Or other natural hazard, such as the Mt's outside Seattle. Or the earthquake regions in CA. Or the volcanos on the island of HI itself.

but that's prudent anyway.

And, given some basic precaution to help your own family.... What can you do to stop it anyway?
450 posted on 01/02/2004 3:17:07 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only support FR by donating monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Kevin Curry
What would be the effect of an eruption?

Geez... what ever happened to the a b c and druptions? And when can we expect to experience an fruption? ;-))

.

524 posted on 01/02/2004 10:02:05 PM PST by GeekDejure ( LOL = Liberals Obey Lucifer !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson