To: AM2000
Hence, totally at odds with the opinion of our learned judiciary, liberal jurisprudence will hold that publicly held property is a socialist myth. A truly liberal constitution would debar the state from holding property.
Notice the use of "liberal" to mean not socialist, as is normal outside the US--and was normal in the US, before freedom's opponents decided that Americans couldn't be sold tyranny under the brand name, "socialism."
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Isn't it crazy, communist countries like Russia and China and socialist countries like India ( or rather I'll say former c and S countries) are moving towards vibrant capitalist models while we in the US are moving towards socialism, welfare states, union run government, government everywhere, taxes, tariffs, restrictions on movement of goods etc.? If things don't change soon and the gov doesn't get smaller and cut all the regulations on trade and commerce, in 2 decades WE will be the poor third worlders.
7 posted on
12/30/2003 11:52:36 PM PST by
Cronos
(W2004!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson