1 posted on
12/30/2003 12:23:40 PM PST by
Dog
To: Dog
I see a JAG script here...
2 posted on
12/30/2003 12:32:19 PM PST by
larryjohnson
( USAF(Ret))
To: Dog
It's about time ... unless we start to have some executions from this batch of terrorists, the world will not take the US serious in it's "war on terror".
However, for some reason I am hesitant to believe that "logic" will win out over political correctness and the above desired results will occur. Watch us give these guys all a handslap and release them under the fear of not getting any 'bad press' from the demoncrats in an election year.
3 posted on
12/30/2003 12:42:38 PM PST by
AgThorn
(Go go Bush!!)
To: Dog
Anybody have ideological profiles on these guys? Bell is a Carterite, but a decent one as I recall. How about the others? Will the RATs be shocked if the tribunal doesn't "look like America"?
4 posted on
12/30/2003 1:00:34 PM PST by
clintonh8r
(You know that KoolAid the RATs have been drinking? Well, I'm the guy who's been pissing in it.)
To: Dog
Good pick for jurists, but how about a good supply of well stretched Kentucky hemp rope. Perhaps the lesser offenders could be assigned to be Hillary's pool boys.
To: Dog
This is a war. The primary purpose of a "trial" should be to determine if the person in question is a danger to the US. If he is determined to be a danger, then the question is if he is a short term danger, requiring that he be held for the life of the conflict, or a long term danger, requiring that he be executed.
If the "trial" determines that he is not a danger, he can be released back to his country of origin.
Legal guilt or innocence should not be an issue in a case like this.
7 posted on
12/30/2003 2:20:04 PM PST by
marron
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson