Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ashcroft Recuses Self From CIA Leak Probe
ABC ^

Posted on 12/30/2003 10:12:19 AM PST by The G Man

Edited on 12/30/2003 10:31:48 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

Update:

Ashcroft Recuses Self From CIA Leak Probe
Attorney General John Ashcroft Will Recuse Himself From Probe Into Who Leaked Name of CIA Operative

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON Dec. 30 ? Attorney General John Ashcroft will recuse himself from an investigation into who leaked the name of a CIA operative, Justice Department sources said Tuesday.

The investigation will be headed by the U.S. attorney in Chicago, Patrick Fitzgerald, who will report to Ashcroft's new deputy, James Comey, the officials said. It was not immediately clear why Ashcroft made the decision.

Investigators want to know who leaked the name of Valerie Plame, an undercover CIA officer, to syndicated columnist Robert Novak in July. Plame is married to former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson, who has said he believes his wife's identity was disclosed to discredit his assertions that the Bush administration exaggerated Iraq's nuclear capabilities to build the case for war.

The leaker could be charged with a felony if identified.

Copyright 2003 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ashcroft; elliottness; plame; plamenameblamegame; plamerosenbergs; robertnovak; traitors; valerieplame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last
To: TomGuy
Funny thing is that the two guests on the Fox show, knew exactly how it should be intrepreted. That stupid Mike Jerrick did not, even though he asked his guests. Mikey wouldn't believe it until his producer whispered in his ear.
41 posted on 12/30/2003 10:22:29 AM PST by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Quilla; nutmeg
Not Rita Cosby but Mike Jerrick standing in for Linda Vester.
42 posted on 12/30/2003 10:23:00 AM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: The G Man
Somehow I don't remember Janet Reno ever recusing herself.
43 posted on 12/30/2003 10:23:08 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Ditto your #43.
44 posted on 12/30/2003 10:24:37 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
**Somehow I don't remember Janet Reno ever recusing herself.
**

LOL!

She didn't even know how to say "Excuse me!"
45 posted on 12/30/2003 10:25:06 AM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Somehow I don't remember Janet Reno ever recusing herself.

I dunno. She would just goto the three judge panel under the independent counsel law, and get them to appoint an independent counsel. I am not sure if that's what Ashcroft is going to do. Maybe he just appoints one on his own (since the IC law is kaput)

46 posted on 12/30/2003 10:25:18 AM PST by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod
How about Gerald Fitzpatrick?
47 posted on 12/30/2003 10:26:13 AM PST by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: The G Man
No, I don't think that would be a proper use of the word, recuse. Spurrier is not disqualifying himself from judging something.

recuse - to disqualify somebody from judging or participating in something because of bias or personal
interest, or withdraw for that reason.

Ashcroft is recusing himself because there is no case here and it would be more meaningful if someone else made this determination. The left is so desperate for some negative news about the Bush administration that they are busy manufacturing it.
49 posted on 12/30/2003 10:26:31 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter
"Funny thing is that the two guests on the Fox show, knew exactly how it should be intrepreted. That stupid Mike Jerrick did not, even though he asked his guests. Mikey wouldn't believe it until his producer whispered in his ear."

Yeah, Mikey's not exactly a hard news guy. But he's great when he's fillin' in on "Fox and Friends". He has a great, quick wit.

50 posted on 12/30/2003 10:26:51 AM PST by Stars N Stripes (My baloney has a first name, it's h o m e r, my baloney has a second name it's h o m e r .......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

To: Blood of Tyrants
The press knows who leaked the information. Pres. Bush asked them point blank to help find the leaker. We're going to spend millions of dollars to come up with a name the press already knows? Maybe the dems are trying to revive the deep throat angle.
53 posted on 12/30/2003 10:27:44 AM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Eva
Are you saying that Steve Spurrier has (GASP!) ... resigned then???
54 posted on 12/30/2003 10:27:57 AM PST by The G Man (Wesley Clark is just Howard Dean in combat boots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

Comment #55 Removed by Moderator

To: The G Man
I thought Ashcroft announced from day one that he would not personally be heading this investigation, so why is this news?
56 posted on 12/30/2003 10:28:34 AM PST by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

Comment #58 Removed by Moderator

To: All
Patrick J. Fitzgerald is a Bush appointee.
59 posted on 12/30/2003 10:29:54 AM PST by Cathryn Crawford (¿Podemos ahora sonreír?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

Comment #60 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson