Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/29/2003 3:28:53 PM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: demlosers

2 posted on 12/29/2003 3:32:42 PM PST by al baby (Ice cream does not have bones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: demlosers
The Martians are getting pissed with all of this junk we've been dropping on their planet.


3 posted on 12/29/2003 3:35:25 PM PST by aomagrat (IYAOYAS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: demlosers
Other possibilities include , but are not limited to,
Burned to a cinder on reentry,partial deployment of chute,
failure to deploy or partial deployment of air bags, landed in martian out house, forgot to set clock back one hour for mars daylight saving time.
4 posted on 12/29/2003 3:36:22 PM PST by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: demlosers
"I think those lights are out on purpose."
5 posted on 12/29/2003 3:40:10 PM PST by aynrandfreak (If 9/11 didn't change you, you're a bad human being)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: demlosers
no signal from Beagle 2 has been received since it touched down on the red planet Christmas Day.

What can you expect when it touches down at 70,000 miles per hour with a vertical approach?

I'm only guessing at the speed.

6 posted on 12/29/2003 3:49:01 PM PST by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: demlosers
If a British space probe smashes into an uninhabited planet's surface and shatters into a million tiny pieces, does it still make a sound?
8 posted on 12/29/2003 4:01:49 PM PST by el_chupacabra (I'm glad you were born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: demlosers
In all seriousness, the problem with landing in a crater is that, by its very nature, the crater was the site of a prior landing and thus a large amount of dust and debris was cast into the surrounding atmosphere. Upon settling, the dust and debris is undoubtedly less dense and therefore softer than a non-cratered landing spot. Maybe the beagle landed such that it is buried in that dust and debris and thus communication paths are occluded by said dust and debris- kind of like burying a golf ball in a sand trap. Landing within a crater may be "by design" so as to avert rocky terrain and guarantee a generally smooth and soft landing spot, but possibly the chosen spot was too soft.

Additionally, I have a feeling that the atmosphere of Mars is not as well characterized as thought or was possibly not modelled appropriately from an aerodynamic perspective, potentially increasing the terminal velocity and ultimately the impact velocity.

Let's say that, in general, I have a sinking feeling with regard to the Beagle II.
10 posted on 12/29/2003 4:58:32 PM PST by Rockitz (After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: demlosers
Finally, the answer to that age-old question:

Q: How do you get a beagle to shut up?
A: Send it to Mars.

11 posted on 12/29/2003 5:25:53 PM PST by Johnny_Cipher (Dimension Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: demlosers
"The dog that didn't bark."
12 posted on 12/29/2003 6:31:22 PM PST by You Dirty Rats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson