Skip to comments.
Fox and Friends turns up the juice.
TV transcript
| 12/29/03
Posted on 12/29/2003 9:31:04 AM PST by ConservativeMan55
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141 next last
To: Clara Lou
"...his capture sends a HUGE message to the terrorist world and to the governments that support them."
I hope you're right. But, the lunatics that are the terrorists don't think like you & me. The only way to get their attention is much more direct than getting SH (who they had no real love for anyhow) like taking out OBL and his inner circle. Even then there are probably a lot of waana bes that would love to fill his shoes.
To: ConservativeMan55
Yes, as a matter of fact it did---and I use it to keep as many annoying things out of my life as possible--starting with tv. You can't imagine how wonderful life is without listening to idiots blather all day. (Listening to people carp about what they are hearing seems a waste of time to me)
42
posted on
12/29/2003 10:22:09 AM PST
by
basil
To: Pharmboy
"...you seem to like Dean.."
I have no idea what leads you to that (mistaken) conclusion. Unless Dean is for sending all illegals home. And yes I am a Freeper, and get really tired of other Freepers that jump to conclusions about others everytime a post is made they don't like. I just don't think SH was that great of a threat to begin with. He was a threta to Iraqis, but not to much else since Desert Storm.
To: familyofman
How are we safer now that SH has been captured? Please be specific - because for the life of me I can't see how we're any safer.That's a false issue to raise. Libs say it as if the administration characterized the capture as making us safer, when they did not. In fact, as usual, President Bush took pains to say that Iraq was still dangerous and terrorism still a threat.
The only reason to present the statement that the capture of Saddam Hussein has not made us safer is to minimize the capture itself.
Pathetic whining with no comprehension of--or a refusal to acknowledge--who Saddam Hussein was.
Here is an excerpt of exactly what President Bush said in his address regarding the capture of Saddam Hussein
Our servicemen and women and our coalition allies have faced many dangers in the hunt for members of the fallen regime, and in their effort to bring hope and freedom to the Iraqi people. Their work continues, and so do the risks. Today, on behalf of the nation, I thank the members of our Armed Forces and I congratulate them.
I also have a message for all Americans: The capture of Saddam Hussein does not mean the end of violence in Iraq. We still face terrorists who would rather go on killing the innocent than accept the rise of liberty in the heart of the Middle East. Such men are a direct threat to the American people, and they will be defeated.
~snip~
44
posted on
12/29/2003 10:31:29 AM PST
by
cyncooper
("The evil is in plain sight")
To: ConservativeMan55
I've loved Steve Doocey ever since he remarked about ClintBilly appearing in a black church (about 6 months ago): "I'm surprised he didn't burst into flames when he went in the church." LOL!!!
45
posted on
12/29/2003 10:32:32 AM PST
by
RooRoobird14
("Leadership, Integrity, Morality: Vote Bush/Cheney 2004")
To: familyofman
To clarify: Not necessarily calling you a whiner, just that's how those who go "The capture did nothing to make us saaaaafer, wahwahwah" sound to me.
I know I've "talked" with you before, and I certainly do not regard you as a troll.
Regards.
46
posted on
12/29/2003 10:34:48 AM PST
by
cyncooper
("The evil is in plain sight")
To: familyofman
You don't want to see how we're safer due to Saddam's capture.
According to Berlusconi, Gaddafi told him that he saw what happened to Saddam, which scared him, and that's why he is cooperating with the US.
Attacks against our troops have decreased.
That's two right there. Who knows what info Saddam will eventually give up.
47
posted on
12/29/2003 10:35:44 AM PST
by
alnick
To: Bluntpoint
"The label "Troll" is thrown around far too much around here.
It is an empty, circle the wagons, intellectually lazy reponse."
It's a good substitute for thought. As soon as anyone says anything different, yell and scream to get rid of them. What a mature way to handle challenges.
48
posted on
12/29/2003 10:38:16 AM PST
by
proust
(Islam is a religion of peace. Please don't kill me!)
To: cyncooper
"The capture of Saddam Hussein does not mean the end of violence in Iraq. We still face terrorists who would rather go on killing the innocent than accept the rise of liberty in the heart of the Middle East. Such men are a direct threat to the American people,..."
The terrorists are still out there. Al Queda still exists (SH's ties to AQ are still in question). The islamic fundamentalists (radicals) are still out there hating the US and Isreal. We just went to Orange.
How are the haters of liberty in the mid east a threat to us, if not through terrorism? I'm very glad SH is no longer at large, but don't think he had any major role in international terrorism.
To: familyofman
You asked,
"How are we safer now that SH has been captured? Please be specific - because for the life of me I can't see how we're any safer." Saddam Hussein's army can no longer attack or threaten it's neighbors, which would pull us into the conflict. He can no longer meddle into the politics of Iran, Pakistan, Saudi, or the smaller arab states, where we have a stake.
Saddam Hussein's worldwide assets, billions of dollars, is no longer available to finance terrorists, or build weapons.
Saddam's regime can no longer sanction terrorism or export it to our shores.
Saddam's imperial image has been damaged beyond repair. His cowardly capture will hurt recruitment of martyrs.
The end of Saddam signals a new beginning for Iraq, and hopefully for decades to come, one less middle eastern country will hate us enough to try and destroy us.
After even democrats so roundly discredited and mocked Dean for saying the world isn't safer without Saddam, you can assume people here would be incredulous anyone would repeat it.
50
posted on
12/29/2003 10:42:47 AM PST
by
YaYa123
(@Common Sense.com)
To: proust
Next to "ZOT," these guys like to "LOL" a lot instead of just answering questions that may cause them a little "cognitive dissonance."
To: cyncooper
"The capture did nothing to make us saaaaafer, wahwahwah" sound to me.
I really don't think I used the "wahwahwah" keys on my keyboard - but if I did I'll be more careful in the future.
Regards
To: ConservativeMan55
I am growing tired of the show as well. The slap stick is really getting on my nerves. I remember Doucey from a Washington DC channel years ago. He has the same routine.
53
posted on
12/29/2003 10:48:54 AM PST
by
maineman
To: ConservativeMan55
We are winning ~ the bad guys are losing!
The democrats and their lackeys in the media are sad ~ very sad!
Be Well ~ Be Armed ~ Be Safe ~ Molon Labe!
54
posted on
12/29/2003 10:49:35 AM PST
by
blackie
To: maineman
I haven't grown tired of the weekday show. Its the weekend show that needs to be taken off.
We need to get a Fire Julian Phillips campaign going.
55
posted on
12/29/2003 10:49:57 AM PST
by
ConservativeMan55
(You know how those liberals are. Two's Company but three is a fundraiser.)
To: ConservativeMan55
BTTT!!!!
56
posted on
12/29/2003 10:55:02 AM PST
by
ConservativeMan55
(You know how those liberals are. Two's Company but three is a fundraiser.)
To: basil; ConservativeMan55
Did you tv come equipped with an off button?CM55, if I am not mistaken, is trying to say that FoxNews should be doing better!
No need for sarcastic, less-than-intelligent comments on this thread.
57
posted on
12/29/2003 10:56:23 AM PST
by
thesummerwind
(Images of broken light which dance before me like a million eyes)
To: thesummerwind
Thank You. What I am trying to say is that I would like for them to be doing better.
I am the customer. Therefore I am giving them a chance to change before I turn the channel.
58
posted on
12/29/2003 10:58:22 AM PST
by
ConservativeMan55
(You know how those liberals are. Two's Company but three is a fundraiser.)
To: familyofman
I concede I got a little creative with my characterization.
:)
59
posted on
12/29/2003 10:59:10 AM PST
by
cyncooper
("The evil is in plain sight")
To: cyncooper
I think your characterization was on the mark. You hit the bulls eye. This guy is a whiner.
He will never be satisfied. He can't even find one good thing to say about this.
60
posted on
12/29/2003 11:00:31 AM PST
by
ConservativeMan55
(You know how those liberals are. Two's Company but three is a fundraiser.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson