Article: Al-Qaeda issues fresh threat

The Age ^ | December 26, 2003 - 8:05AM

[spectre]

"any comments?"

Yes, I think that IF they could have hit us (without warning) they would have done so already.

sw

[DaughterofEve]

< g >

[Mossad1967]

I would not be at all surprised if this Airplane stuff is just a big diversion by the enemy. They will hit us where we will least expext it.

I can see them hitting us on the ground and by sea.
It will be right under our noses but, I fear that we won't see it coming.

Expect the unexpected with these lunatics.

[Wilhelm Tell]

I assume the authorities are aware of this "almojahid" website? Even assuming that this is not from the horse's mouth (or whatever), it still could be the rantings of a faniatic who knows something -- and these fanatics talk (and brag) too much and I think that will lead to their eventual downfall.

If I were to believe every ranting I have read from the Islamofascists, I would have to conclude that I have already been killed 100 times over! I'm pretty sure I'm not dead so no, I'm not shaking in my boots. Still, I found one of the rants interesting. It said that they had attacked the tail of the snake on 9/11 and now they would attack the head of the snake. I presume that by the "head of the snake," they mean the West Coast somewhere. I assume this terminology is common among the terrorists, and a terrorist sympathiser could say a lot of plausible-sounding things without really knowing what the terrorists were planning. And how nice of the terrorists to put their warnings in, if not plain English, at least in a religious fanatic apocolyptic delusional sort of English. Still, I hope the authorities are aware of their site, although I bet the really interesting stuff is in Arabic.

[Hugin]

Lying sons of dogs! May their manhood wither, and their camels go unsatisfied!

[tbpiper]

Will this tape be another rerun?

It'd be a hoot if we could switch it for an episode of Gilligan's Island.

[Wilhelm Tell]

Lying sons of dogs! May their manhood wither, and their camels go unsatisfied!

LOL! And don't forget about the sheep. Baaaaaa!

[BriarBey]

The screen is black...what is this about highlighting? How do you read it? Thanks

[mrtysmm]

After reading all of these posts from the friends of Ben Laden, posts claiming responsibility for the attack on Sept. 11th, how then can some of the dem/libs claim that it was NOT al Queda who was responsible for those terrible acts? Seems to me that the responsiblity lies squarely with ben Laden. Just wondering. Anyone have any thoughts on this?

[slagish]

Try hitting Crtl-A to select all the text on the page.

[BriarBey]

How do you read it? Thanks





Yes stupid!! YOU HIGHLIGHT IT!! Duh!!! (never mind)

[hobson]

What you said. And curse their mustaches.

[BriarBey]

Wondering what you guys all think..


I don't understand having nuclear capabilities and playing with airplanes, and screwing that up to boot. I'm beginning to think the bagdad bob stuff too. Alot of this is hype but then what do I know, I'm answering my own questions in the posts....sigh.

[texasbluebell]

I don't recall being nervous once today.

I haven't been the least bit nervous today, or for the past few days, not even with Code Orange.

Sc**w the bastids. Kakate Koi.

[null and void]

On the other hand, something feels VERY different about this "Orange Plus" alert we are apparently at. It has an ominous feel to it..kind of like something truly huge is about to happen. Yet, they are going after airplanes again. Bizarre!

Generals are always preparing to fight the last war...

[oceanview]

exactly right, I have been saying the same thing.

they still need to hijack the weapons they need, yet boast and make claims regarding pre-planted WMD inside the US.

its a disconnect.

[Wilhelm Tell]

Another way to read it is to view the source code of the page -- you'll have to wade through a lot of HTML tags, but the text will appear in legible black and white and be easy to read.

One thing is clear to me -- all of the rants on that site seem to be written by the same person. The same mis-spellings appear over and over. It was written by someone whose native language is not English, who has a pretty good knowledge of slang but still makes spelling and grammatical mistakes. One thing I forgot to think about was whether the writer used American or British spelling. The writer could be a 30 year old loser who is living in his mother's basement for all I know, LOL.

Another thing that is becomming clearer to me is that this Islamic Jihad is more of a religious cult that a political movement. I know, duh! I really used to think of them as political wackos who were using religion, but now I think of them more as a religious cult with end-of-the-world delusions -- sort of like that cult in Japan that poisoned a subway a few years ago. They are crazy.

One final thought I had as I was reading the fanatical Jihadist rants -- it must really suck to be them.

[null and void]

None so blind as those who REFUSE to see...

[null and void]

One final thought I had as I was reading the fanatical Jihadist rants -- it must really suck to be them.

BIG time

[BagCamAddict]

The "head of the snake" would be President Bush. I am basing this on the blog of an Iraqi just after Saddam was captured. He referred to Saddam as the head of the snake. Therefore, when AQ talks about killing OUR head of the snake, I believe they mean Bush.

It said that they had attacked the tail of the snake on 9/11 and now they would attack the head of the snake. I presume that by the "head of the snake," they mean the West Coast somewhere.