Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHEN BLUE STATES ATACK
World Net Daily ^ | Posted: December 24, 2003 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 12/24/2003 2:45:47 PM PST by RaceBannon

When blue states attack

Posted: December 24, 2003 1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2003 Universal Press Syndicate

Uttering the standard liberal cliche a few years ago, Richard Reeves described "representatives of the new South" as "Republicans of old puritan definition, righteous folk afraid that someone, somewhere, is having fun." (I'll skip the context of Reeves' insight, except to note that apparently aging liberals view sodomy with a chubby intern in the back office as "having fun.")

Like all beliefs universally held by liberals, Reeves' aphorism is the precise opposite of the truth.

It's the blue states that are constantly sending lawyers to the red states to bother everyone. Americans in the red states look at a place like New York City – where, this year, the Macy's Thanksgiving Day parade featured a gay transvestite as Mrs. Claus – and say, Well, I guess some people like it, but it's not for me.

Meanwhile, liberals in New York and Washington are consumed with what people are doing in Alabama and Nebraska. Nadine Strossen and Barry Lynn cannot sleep at night knowing that someone, somewhere, is gazing upon something that could be construed as a religious symbol.

It's never Jerry Falwell flying to Manhattan to review high-school graduation speeches, or James Dobson making sure New York City schools give as much time to God as to Mother Earth, or Pat Robertson demanding a creche next to the schools' Kwanzaa displays. (Is it just me, or is Kwanzaa becoming way too commercialized?)

But when four schools in southern Ohio have displays of the Ten Commandments, sirens go off in Nadine Strossen's Upper West Side apartment. It will surprise no one to learn that the American Civil Liberties Union promptly sued and the schools are now Ten Commandments-free. (At least students in the Ten Commandments schools, as opposed to schools in New York, Washington and Los Angeles, might reasonably be expected to know how to count up to 10.)

From the Chelsea section of Manhattan, the gay, Bronx-born Puerto Rican executive director of the ACLU, Anthony Romero, tossed and turned all night thinking about the Ten Commandments display on the Elkhart, Ind., municipal building, which had been there, without incident, since 1958. The ACLU sued and the monument was hauled off.

In Ohio, Richland County Common Pleas Judge James DeWeese had a framed poster of the Ten Commandments in his courtroom. The ACLU sued and the Ten Commandments came down. Compare that to the late New York judge Elliott Wilk, who famously displayed a portrait of communist revolutionary Che Guevara on his office wall. (Che, Castro, Hussein – evidently the only bearded revolutionary these people don't like is Jesus Christ.) And yet, no one from Ohio ever sued Wilk.

The ACLU got word of a Ten Commandments monument in a public park in Plattsmouth, Neb. (pop. 7,000), and immediately swooped in to demand that the offensive symbol be removed. Not being from New York, Plattsmouth didn't want to litigate. Soon cranes were in the park ripping out a monument that had sat there, not bothering anyone, for 40 years.

ACLU busybodies sued Johnson County, Iowa, demanding that it remove a Ten Commandments monument that had been in a public courtyard a since 1964. Within a year, the 2,500-pound granite monument was gone.

Mail-order minister Barry Lynn's Americans United for Separation of Church and State – a group curiously devoid of both Americans and churchgoers – sued little Chester County, Pa., demanding that it remove a Ten Commandments plaque that has hung on the courthouse wall since 1920.

"The Upper West Side and Malibu United" also sued the city of Everett, Wash., demanding the removal of a Ten Commandments monument in front of the police station. AU legal director Ayesha Khan explained they had nothing like that back in Pakistan and look how well things turned out there.

(Perhaps in addition to the usual processing requirements for new immigrants, there should be a form that says: Welcome to America! You will no longer have to live in a mud hut, earn 32 cents a year, and have members of your family periodically dragged off and shot. However, you may, on occasion, have to see people praying.)

The alleged legal basis for removing all of these Ten Commandments monuments is the establishment clause of the First Amendment. That clause provides: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion." The vigilant observer will note instantly that none of the monuments cases involves Congress, a law or an establishment of religion.

Monuments are not "laws," the Plattsmouth, Neb., public park is not "Congress," and the Ten Commandments are not a religion. To the contrary, all three major religions believe in Moses and the Ten Commandments. Liberals might as well say the establishment clause prohibits Republicans from breathing, as that it prohibits a Ten Commandments display. But over the past few years, courts have ordered the removal of dozens and dozens of Ten Commandments displays.

How a local judge acknowledging a higher power with a symbol used by all three major religions is the same as Congress establishing a national religion remains a legal mystery – like, how the University of Michigan can use one admissions standard for blacks and another for whites and yet it's not race discrimination.

How about a truce? The intolerant religious fanatics in the red states will continue not complaining about high taxes, secular education and gay-rights parades in the blue states, and the proponents of tolerance in the blue states will stop bothering everyone in the red states.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ann; anncoulter; bluezone; coulter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
...

...

1 posted on 12/24/2003 2:45:48 PM PST by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon; JohnHuang2
please bump
2 posted on 12/24/2003 2:58:34 PM PST by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
"When Blue States Attack".... why did I think this was a Civil War thread?
3 posted on 12/24/2003 3:00:43 PM PST by Rytwyng
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon; hellinahandcart
Just once, I would like to see a township (after having been sued by the ACLU and losing), tell the ACLU to stick it and try enforcing the ruling.

Just once.

4 posted on 12/24/2003 3:02:58 PM PST by sauropod ("If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Why don't we just fence off the Blue Zone and blockade it? Let them try to feed themselves, fix their own cars, etc. Of course they'd litigate themselves to death most likely, since they don't believe in firearms.

Nice photos of Ann, BTW - thanks.
5 posted on 12/24/2003 3:04:38 PM PST by 11B3 (Liberalism is merely another form of mental retardation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
I see this "Democrats = blues states" nonsense is now completely ingrained in the culture, even though it was the GOP that has been traditionally designated in blue (before 2000) by the media. "Commie red" is a much more appropriate color for the Rats.
6 posted on 12/24/2003 3:05:45 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
AU legal director Ayesha Khan explained they had nothing like that back in Pakistan and look how well things turned out there.

snicker

7 posted on 12/24/2003 3:13:05 PM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11B3
Why don't we just fence off the Blue Zone and blockade it? Let them try to feed themselves, fix their own cars, etc. Of course they'd litigate themselves to death most likely, since they don't believe in firearms.

Now is that really fair to those of us trapped deep behind enemy lines?

8 posted on 12/24/2003 3:23:23 PM PST by hc87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Next time some "liberal" calls us Nazis, remember that an accusation is sometimes a subconscious confession.

9 posted on 12/24/2003 3:35:12 PM PST by Salamander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
There should be a remake of "A Christmas Carol" with that ACLU lawyer as Ebenezer Scrooge. Don't fret too much about the ACLU. Everyone hates them, and they're the # 1 albatross around the neck of the Democratic party. Let them keep pulling their stunts and costing Dems elections.
10 posted on 12/24/2003 3:43:22 PM PST by wontbackdown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
WHAT A WONDERFUL DOCUMENT!

THANKS.
11 posted on 12/24/2003 3:56:34 PM PST by Quix (Particularly quite true conspiracies are rarely proven until it's too late to do anything about them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

I see this "Democrats = blues states" nonsense is now completely ingrained in the culture, even though it was the GOP that has been traditionally designated in blue (before 2000) by the media. "Commie red" is a much more appropriate color for the Rats.

I agree. But who made this decision? Why did all the media, even Fox News, change?

12 posted on 12/24/2003 3:59:27 PM PST by Dan Evans (better red than dem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 11B3
hMMMM

LET THEM litigate themselves to death.

What a wonderful idea!

What a fitting "medical 'procedure' " !!!

Perhaps Shrillery would volunteer to be point idiot--err--idiot on point--err--First Idiot to put their law degree and vacuum head on the line?
13 posted on 12/24/2003 4:02:53 PM PST by Quix (Particularly quite true conspiracies are rarely proven until it's too late to do anything about them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Interesting that Ann Coulter should quote Richard Reeves, a now retired columnist operating out of the DesMoines Register, as I recall. His national platform was the result of nepotism - either his family or his wife's owned the paper, and gave Little Richard a national column. Sort of how John "fuc..." Kerry got his national platform.
14 posted on 12/24/2003 4:20:37 PM PST by scotiamor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
FYI La Crosse, WI is fighting to save their monument, much
to the dismay of the mayor.
15 posted on 12/24/2003 4:34:14 PM PST by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
I see this "Democrats = blues states" nonsense is now completely ingrained in the culture, even though it was the GOP that has been traditionally designated in blue (before 2000) by the media. "Commie red" is a much more appropriate color for the Rats.

During the 2000 election debacle, my recollection jibed with yours so I looked at some materials from earlier elections. Color assignments in earlier elections were not consistent; while I agree that blue for Republicans and red for Democrats might be ideologically appropriate, this is not the first election where Republicans have been red and Democrats blue. BTW, I found it interesting that in the 1996 race the networks used shades of red and blue which were indistinguishable on a black and white television set.

16 posted on 12/24/2003 4:43:48 PM PST by supercat (Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
But I look so much better in red than blue!
Red is such a power color, I think it more appropriate for the right wing to adopt the color.
And because we are not completely devoid of mercy, the slow learning Democrats can resurrect all those old signs and t-shirts from their closets carefully packed away since the Cold War.
"Better Red than Dead"
It allows them to appear to have a consistent viewpoint!
ROTFLMAO!
17 posted on 12/24/2003 4:46:19 PM PST by sarasmom (Message to the DOD : Very good , troops.Carry on. IN MY NAME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hc87

Now is that really fair to those of us trapped deep behind enemy lines?

Switzerland has been trapped amidst quarreling Blue Meanies for centuries. They've had the same government for 400 years and only been invaded once.

18 posted on 12/24/2003 4:49:18 PM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CMailBag
Good for them!!! Do you have any info on how us regular folks can support 'em?
19 posted on 12/24/2003 4:51:49 PM PST by sauropod ("If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Ann Coulter has an issue with your position on Roy Moore ping
20 posted on 12/24/2003 5:28:24 PM PST by thoughtomator ("I will do whatever the Americans want because I saw what happened in Iraq, and I was afraid"-Qadafi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson