Yeah. So were two klansmen and several communists. There's also an abortion attorney (Ginsburg), two left wing kooks from the tin foil zone (Ginsburg and Stevens) on the current court. So being a supreme court justice does not necessarily make one qualified to make sound constitutional arguments and in fact the overwhelming majority of the justices of lesser quality don't! O'Connor's recent actions have placed her in that realm of bad justices and demonstrated that whatever competency she once had on constitutional matters, if any ever existed, has long since been supplanted by poor and unqualified judgment.
Your credentials are better?
In light of O'Connor's recent actions on sodomy, affirmative action, and campaign finance, yes. Those actions also make practically any thinking, competant, and reasonably well learned conservative a better credentialed constitutional scholar than O'Connor.
BUMP for honesty. There are only FOUR conservative justices on the current US Supreme Court.