To: JeanS
I wonder what the legal basis for this ruling is? As usual with court cases, the article does not spell it out in any detail.
16 posted on
12/24/2003 10:34:00 AM PST by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: Steve_Seattle
I agree. Where is the jurisdiction? Where is the administration breaking a law?
18 posted on
12/24/2003 10:35:47 AM PST by
rudypoot
To: Steve_Seattle
A federal appeals court on Wednesday blocked new Bush administration changes to the Clean Air Act from going into effect the next day, in a challenge from state attorneys general and cities that argued they would harm the environment and public health. Are you blind? Don't you know that it is the court's Constitutional duty to continually second-guess the other two branches of government, and stop any legislation that could harm the desert pygmy rat?!
/S>
To: Steve_Seattle
I wonder what the legal basis for this ruling is? It appears that they are issuing an injuction. From the AP article:
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia issued an order that blocks the rules from going into effect until the legal challenge from the states and cities is heard, a process likely to last months.
37 posted on
12/24/2003 12:01:03 PM PST by
dirtboy
(New Ben and Jerry's flavor - Howard Dean Swirl - no ice cream, just fruit at bottom)
To: Steve_Seattle
Stupid article never mentions any grounds for the ruling. Mus be a 'thin-air' decision.
54 posted on
12/25/2003 3:55:52 PM PST by
gitmo
(Who is John Galt?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson