[John W]

It is indeed a mystery if they know and didn't use it,in fact,haven't told us.You both admit to not knowing why.Do you assume whatever the reason it was a good one?I'm not certain it isn't just another "crowd control" issue by the folks in power.

[hobbes1]

See Above.

[Peach]

I don't profess to know why the Bush admin. hasn't talked more about the anthrax issue. I can only think it's because they don't have "proof" that will satisfy the media and why bother. They know what they know and feel comfortable enough with their knowledge to go to war.

[Sabertooth]

It is indeed a mystery if they know and didn't use it,in fact,haven't told us.You both admit to not knowing why.Do you assume whatever the reason it was a good one?I'm not certain it isn't just another "crowd control" issue by the folks in power.

I recall reading somewheere that we are signatories to a UN convention of some sort that gives that body authority over investigations and responses if a signatory is attacked with a WMD. If true, that might be reason enough, in the minds of the Administration, to keep quiet about anything short of an absolute smoking gun.