To: Peach
Definitely. I have no doubt it was Iraq behind the anthrax, and I believe the Bush administration believes that as well. Of course the Bush Administration knows. Why they didn't use it as causus beli(sp?) for invading Iraq, I don't know.
44 posted on
12/24/2003 6:42:38 AM PST by
NeoCaveman
(The only thing found in the middle of the road are yellow streaks and roadkill)
To: dubyaismypresident
It's an enduring mystery to me as well.
45 posted on
12/24/2003 6:43:30 AM PST by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: dubyaismypresident
I think it is because they can't prove it...
51 posted on
12/24/2003 6:46:58 AM PST by
carton253
(It's time to draw your sword and throw away the scabbard... General TJ Jackson)
To: dubyaismypresident; Peach
It is indeed a mystery if they know and didn't use it,in fact,haven't told us.You both admit to not knowing why.Do you assume whatever the reason it was a good one?I'm not certain it isn't just another "crowd control" issue by the folks in power.
53 posted on
12/24/2003 6:47:11 AM PST by
John W
To: dubyaismypresident
Of course the Bush Administration knows. Why they didn't use it as causus beli(sp?) for invading Iraq, I don't know. Because the information is far too intricate, for general public assimilation.
Look at the short shrift given to the Ramzi Yousef/KSM/Iraq/Baluchistan connection.
54 posted on
12/24/2003 6:47:51 AM PST by
hobbes1
( Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson