Skip to comments.
Banned by AOL
American Spectator ^
| 12/22/2003
| Kathy Shaidle
Posted on 12/23/2003 3:12:09 PM PST by walford
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
My wife quit AOL years ago [before Win98 came out, that's how long it's been] because pop-up windows BEFORE the browser even came up that would bomb out her computer.
Now it turns out that AOL is nannying people's e-mail and search results? And you have to pay HOW much/month?
1
posted on
12/23/2003 3:12:10 PM PST
by
walford
To: walford
I can't believe that anyone still pays them for their version of the Internet on training wheels.
2
posted on
12/23/2003 3:14:34 PM PST
by
Orangedog
(Remain calm...all is well! [/sarcasm])
To: walford
What is AOL? Is thea the company that sends me free CD's for target practice?
They make GREAT targets at 100 yards.
3
posted on
12/23/2003 3:15:31 PM PST
by
MonroeDNA
(Soros is the enemy.)
To: walford
I can't believe people still use A-Hole-Hell. Apart from this babe's complaint, it's just slightly above WebTV as a refuge for denizens of the shallow end of the gene pool.
To: walford
AOL...worthless, useless and hopeless.
5
posted on
12/23/2003 3:20:46 PM PST
by
clintonh8r
(You know that KoolAid the RATs have been drinking? Well, I'm the guy who's been pissing in it.)
To: walford
I just clicked on the article and mailed it to 3 AOL accounts, one of which is mine. I'll see what happens.
6
posted on
12/23/2003 3:25:52 PM PST
by
DLfromthedesert
(We got Saddam, but Vicente's still at large.)
To: walford
AOL for losers
To: walford
Nice poem!
And you mean folks still use AOL?
8
posted on
12/23/2003 3:27:12 PM PST
by
k2blader
(I will shake the nations, and the desired of all nations will come. - Haggai 2:7 -)
To: walford
Yes they do and they dood it frequently. I have a daily newsletter called 'Liberty Watch' which I send out to subscribers all over the U.S. It is SIMPLY a collection of links to hard news stories on bonafide, legitimate news sites. I engage in no commentary whatsoever; just send the links to people too busy to surf themselves. I suspect that some of the linked stories were dissing homos and thats why the mail was rejected. Back to your statement about the canned reason they gave you 'it has generated a large number of complaints'...... I only had one AOL subscriber and I know he did not complain (he is a personal friend) - the bottom line - AOL is censoring anything that is pro-family, pro-God and against buttsex.
9
posted on
12/23/2003 3:32:32 PM PST
by
hardhead
("Curly, if you say its a fine morning, I'll shoot you." John Wayne, 'McLintock, 1963')
To: walford
Bumper sticker idea.
"AOL is for People Who don't Know any Better."
10
posted on
12/23/2003 3:33:18 PM PST
by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
To: Leroy S. Mort
I can't believe people still use A-Hole-Hell. Apart from this babe's complaint, it's just slightly above WebTV as a refuge for denizens of the shallow end of the gene pool
Say what you want about the users, but at least WebTV's (or MSN TV, whatever) do not get viruses!
To: DLfromthedesert
I just clicked on the article and mailed it to 3 AOL accounts, one of which is mine. I'll see what happens.
Please post the results -- that should prove to be interesting...
12
posted on
12/23/2003 3:38:07 PM PST
by
walford
(Believe it or not, we have options beyond SECULAR dogmatism and RELIGIOUS dogmatism)
To: walford
Well, I just went to my account, and there it was; I just went the link. I don't know if the respondant tried to copy and paste the article.
13
posted on
12/23/2003 3:39:29 PM PST
by
DLfromthedesert
(We got Saddam, but Vicente's still at large.)
To: saluki_in_ohio
WebTV was my introduction to the net; at the time, laptops were still very expensive, and I didn't want any more clutter in my house.
14
posted on
12/23/2003 3:42:46 PM PST
by
DLfromthedesert
(We got Saddam, but Vicente's still at large.)
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: neverdem
not military related, but click on the links to see the background behind this "holiday"
To: walford
A sign of things to come.
17
posted on
12/23/2003 3:49:15 PM PST
by
Dr. Eckleburg
(There are very few shades of gray.)
To: walford
18
posted on
12/23/2003 3:49:30 PM PST
by
L.N. Smithee
(Just because I don't think like you doesn't mean I don't think for myself)
To: walford
Good. Let AOL block what it will. Maybe the people for whom I still hold out hope - those just beginning their slide into morondom - will ditch it pronto.
19
posted on
12/23/2003 3:49:31 PM PST
by
Xenalyte
(I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
To: walford
Very odd. I tried to forward this link to an AOL subscriber, but I got a 'Delivery Status Notification' message from postmaster@mail.hotmail.com saying that the link was reported as offensive and automatically blocked. Does AOL really censor email?
I take it the person sending the email is using hotmail. You can get this message if either hotmail or AOL is blocking the email.
You'll have to dig further down into the email and see if it was AOLs or hotmail's server that blocked it.
20
posted on
12/23/2003 3:49:42 PM PST
by
lelio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson