Posted on 12/23/2003 2:48:01 PM PST by Mr. Silverback
Since the nineteenth century, we have been told a story about nature, man, and science. The story, the product of a materialistic worldview, tells us how science put man in his proper place: not at the center of creation, but at the periphery, a cosmic accident.
Science, the story goes, not only "dethroned" man, it rendered God, and belief in God, superfluous. And of course, "there is no evidence of a spiritual realm, or that God or souls are real." There is only "matter: atoms in ceaseless, aimless motion," and since atoms have "no purposes or goals," there is no "cosmic purpose or meaning."
The problem with this story, of course, as physicist Stephen Barr tells us in his new book, MODERN PHYSICS AND ANCIENT FAITH, is that it doesn't take into account some of the most important "plot twists," the kind that change the ending completely.
By "plot twists," Barr means recent discoveries and insights into how the universe came into being and the laws by which it is governed.
One plot twist is the Big Bang. For decades, materialists believed that the universe was without a beginning. They regarded the belief that there was a beginning to time as one held for religious, not scientific reasons. But then came the discovery of the Big Bang, which shocked many of these scientists.
While the Big Bang doesn't necessarily prove the Christian doctrine of creation, it is undoubtedly "a blow to the materialist view," says Barr.
Another plot twist concerns the "dethroning of man." Materialism regards human existence to be a "fortuitous concourse of atoms." Then in the 1970s a new term entered scientific discourse: anthropic coincidences. What this means is that "certain features of the laws of physics seem -- just coincidentally -- to be exactly what is needed" for life to be possible.
One example is what physicists call the "strong nuclear force," the force that holds atoms together. If it were only 10 percent weaker, none of the elements, much less life, would exist. Likewise, if the electromagnetism were a bit stronger, "it would make it impossible for life as we know it to exist."
These are hardly the only so-called "anthropic coincidences." Barr discusses eleven of them in his book. What's more, as scientists "have looked harder, the number of such [so-called] 'coincidences' have grown."
Barr doesn't say that either of these plot twists "succeeded in ending the old debate between religion and materialism." What these and other discoveries have done is to "dramatically [change] the nature of the debate."
Barr tells us that "it is no longer a question of whether one can find any evidence in nature that [human beings] were built in [to the design of the cosmos]." The question is "whether that evidence . . . " -- which I think is clear -- "really means what it seems to mean."
Given the dogmatic nature of materialism, the other side's answer will be "no." They will look for ways to get around the evidence. It's what materialists always do. What Christians must do is learn about these discoveries so that they can tell others about how the story really ends: It ends where it began with "In the beginning, God . . . "
Bears repeating...
If you want on or off this list, notify me here or by freepmail.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.