Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: snopercod
It they were confused, they should have asked the Judge for clarification.

That was my first thought when I heard this.

322 posted on 12/25/2003 4:14:39 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies ]


To: leadpenny
I was involved in a civil misdemeanor case last year - judge only, no jury - and the defense attorney purposely got the thing scheduled just before quitting time.

He knew the habits of the judge, and knew the judge wouldn't miss his supper in order to hear the entire case.

A hearing in chambers was hastilly called at 4:30PM, and when the judge came back, a "not guilty" verdict was rendered without hearing any witnesses at all.

323 posted on 12/25/2003 4:20:49 AM PST by snopercod (CAUTION: Do not operate heavy equipment while reading this post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson