To: Ronin
But mecca is as "symbolic" to these idiots as New york was to them. If "symbolic" is all they understand, then perhaps a "symbolic" reaction to to such an act of terror might be what is needed.
151 posted on
12/23/2003 5:07:50 PM PST by
freeangel
(freeangel)
To: freeangel
But mecca is as "symbolic" to these idiots as New york was to them. If "symbolic" is all they understand, then perhaps a "symbolic" reaction to to such an act of terror might be what is needed. Better yet,Would be to capture Mecca and rename it the Palace of Pigs.
Fill the place full of hungry swine and feed any little jihadi that shows up within 1000 miles of the place to the pigs within.
156 posted on
12/23/2003 5:26:33 PM PST by
HP8753
(My cat doesn't see the humor in static electricity.... ;-)
To: freeangel
I agree. And I am not saying threatening Mecca would be a bad idea, it would certainly wake them up.
But Bush couldn't do it. The "compassionate" nature of Americans as a whole would not allow it, and even if Bush were to make the threat, the islamonazis wouldn't believe it.
Not to mention the fact that if he were to even mention taking retaliatory action against Mecca he would be hounded out of office by the leftist suicidal twits in congress and the media who would make him out a potential mass murderer.
161 posted on
12/23/2003 6:23:04 PM PST by
Ronin
(Qui docet discit!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson