To: Conservomax
We fought a war over taxtion without representation once. Bring it on UN.
2 posted on
12/22/2003 7:35:13 PM PST by
Brett66
To: Brett66
To: Brett66
What part of "we don't even want your treacherous, incompetent, bungling, floundering, useless organization in our country", do you not understand Kofi?
91 posted on
12/23/2003 8:00:41 PM PST by
Let's Roll
(Support our brave troops as they protect us from evil.)
To: Brett66
It is already happening indirectly. Our government taxes us. Our government is the major source of funds for the U.N. Therefore, we are paying taxes to the U.N.
102 posted on
12/24/2003 9:11:45 AM PST by
MichiganCheese
(Does the PC crowd know that holiday is derived from HOLY DAY?)
To: Brett66
We fought a war over taxtion without representation once. Bring it on UN
HEAR HEAR!!!
We will not let this happen again...!
Bring it UN..may your death be by our hand!
107 posted on
12/24/2003 1:26:57 PM PST by
MetalHeadConservative35
(what the heck! its 2003 !! wheres my jetsons car!!! (and yes democrats still cause cancer)
To: Brett66
Yeah! That's what the Boston Tea Party was about!!!!!!!!!!
108 posted on
12/24/2003 4:18:22 PM PST by
davidosborne
(www.davidosborne.net)
To: Brett66
We fought a war over taxtion without representation once. Bring it on UN.We have a UN ambassador, and he's one of the few with veto power. Ergo, we have viable representation. That point has no basis. UN taxation is certainly an evil idea to be destroyed, but that isn't the argument to use.
And remember, taxation WITH representation isn't all that hot, either!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
