Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic
Congress and the USSC don't need to reach into the Commerce Clause to violate religious freedoms. They can just go straight to the 1st amendment and violate that.
99 posted on 12/24/2003 6:17:58 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
Congress and the USSC don't need to reach into the Commerce Clause to violate religious freedoms. They can just go straight to the 1st amendment and violate that.

That argument doesn't come anywhere near addressing the points and issues they're talking about. If you're going to defend Wickard v. Filburn and the substantial effects doctrine, those are the issues you'll have to address, and some of the people you've set youself up against.

101 posted on 12/24/2003 6:32:41 AM PST by tacticalogic (Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson