Posted on 12/22/2003 3:22:02 PM PST by Ol' Dan Tucker
Edited on 04/14/2004 10:06:33 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Bob Dornan thinks he's found Rep. Dana Rohrabacher's Achilles' heel, the issue that will be the Huntington Beach incumbent's downfall when the March Republican primary rolls around.
Drugs.
In his challenge to Rohrabacher, Dornan has quickly made the subject an issue, focusing on his opponent's drug use as a young man and his support for legalizing medicinal marijuana.
(Excerpt) Read more at 2.ocregister.com ...
That argument doesn't come anywhere near addressing the points and issues they're talking about. If you're going to defend Wickard v. Filburn and the substantial effects doctrine, those are the issues you'll have to address, and some of the people you've set youself up against.
And what would those be? Nowhere in the article did it reference a religious freedom curtailed by the use of the Commerce Clause.
What a waste of time.
What a waste of time.
If that's the best answer you've got, then yes, it is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.