Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Look out, anti-war gang
NY Daily News ^ | December 22 2003 | Bill O'Reilly

Posted on 12/22/2003 9:18:53 AM PST by knighthawk

If Saddam-9/11 link pans out, lefties will be discredited

In August 2002, thugs from Saddam Hussein's secret police shot notorious terrorist Abu Nidal dead in a Baghdad residence where he had been staying as Saddam's supposed guest. The Iraqis immediately labeled Nidal's death a suicide, causing much commotion among fans of "CSI," as the man apparently shot himself four times in the head. Nidal, you may remember, was a Palestinian killer who roamed Europe and the Middle East in the '70s and '80s creating mayhem and murdering civilians. He felt right at home in Iraq. So why was he murdered? Good question.

The importance of this execution may be enormous. The Sunday Telegraph of London says that a document discovered in Iraq details a meeting between Nidal and the leader of the 9/11 attack, Mohamed Atta.

The document was allegedly written by Tahir Jalil Habbush al-Tikriti, the former head of the Iraqi Intelligence Service and a man still on the run. Dated July, 1, 2001, three months before 9/11, the text says that Atta, along with a man named Abu Ammer, met with Nidal for three days under the direct supervision of the Iraqi Intelligence Service. The document mentions "targets that we agree must be destroyed."

If this memorandum is legitimate, it will obviously change many things, because it establishes that elusive link between Saddam and Al Qaeda.

First, Howard Dean's credibility will be shattered, and he will cease to be a viable candidate for the Democrats. Second, France, Germany, Russia and the UN will be humiliated. And third, the far-left anti-war people will be marginalized for years to come in this country.

One must assume the Bush administration knows about this captured document, which is now believed to be in the hands of Iraqis working for the interim government. But it has not been mentioned in any public way by the U.S. Since disinformation is common in Iraq and since the anti-Saddam Iraqi contingent was woefully wrong about WMDs, the Bush people may be prudent in keeping quiet about this until its validity is confirmed beyond a reasonable doubt.

Saddam, of course, knows every devious thing his government did. This is why there should be no rush to bring him to trial. The CIA should take all the time it needs to find out everything this psychopath knows. And they should use all methods short of instrumental torture to get answers.

Saddam should be deprived of sleep, loaded up with truth serum, kept isolated and underfed, confronted with noise - whatever it takes. While the United Nations and a Vatican cardinal complain about what they call his dignity, most Americans would like to be protected from another 9/11, thank you very much.

With a U.S. team still searching for those annoying WMDs, with Saddam in custody, with a potentially explosive Iraqi Intelligence Service memo in play, just about anything could happen in the next few months vis- ... -vis Iraq. There are a lot of very powerful people sweating these developments, as they could be career altering. Even though he is now a common prisoner, Saddam Hussein retains a vast amount of power simply because of what he knows. It will be fascinating to see how he uses that power.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911; alqaedaandiraq; antiwar; lefties; nydaily; oreilly; saddamhussein; september11
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 12/22/2003 9:18:54 AM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; Turk2; keri; ...
Ping
2 posted on 12/22/2003 9:19:24 AM PST by knighthawk (Full of power I'm spreading my wings, facing the storm that is gathering near)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Abu Nidal. Nom de guere/a.k.a. Sabri Al-Bana.
3 posted on 12/22/2003 9:22:55 AM PST by Khurkris (Ranger On...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
And they should use all methods short of instrumental torture to get answers.

Now let's not be a bunch of wussies. He and his sons tortured for the sheer joy of it. What goes around comes around. Let the punishment fit the crime.

When we pour that white-hot lead up his keister, he'll sing like Whitney Houston.

4 posted on 12/22/2003 9:24:52 AM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
related thred at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1044905/posts

Saddam waged a proxy terror campaign against us after '91. Clinton, at best, refused to see it... more probable, he covered it up.
5 posted on 12/22/2003 9:26:39 AM PST by Lexington Green (Politician - Lawyer - Journalist.... when you lie for a living)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
I think O'Reilly is being overly optimistic here. The Dems will brazen it out even if we turn up a hand-signed love-note between Saddam and Osama and stumble across a stack of WMD in a forgotten bunker somewhere. They really haven't a choice. Their politics has been reduced to ideological positioning, and Bush not only has the incumbency, he has the initiative. Silly position for professional politicians to be in, actually.
6 posted on 12/22/2003 9:28:18 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
I was wondering why the NY Daily News, which is owned and run by leftist friends of the clintons, would run this story, which seems to vindicate Bush. Then I came to this:

First, Howard Dean's credibility will be shattered, and he will cease to be a viable candidate for the Democrats. Second, France, Germany, Russia and the UN will be humiliated. And third, the far-left anti-war people will be marginalized for years to come in this country.

I think that explains it. Never mind that hillary was in Iraq right after Thanksgiving telling the troups that the American people didn't support them and was busy bashing Bush last week for attacking Iraq. Those little episodes will be thrown down the memory hole. No, the point is that DEAN is the designated goat, the official ANTIWAR candidate. All good Democrats must disown him. Hillary has given orders to that effect, and the ever obsequious Daily News is eager to obey.

7 posted on 12/22/2003 9:33:55 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
If the Democrats can consider a crying baby with just one toe still in the birth canal "potential life," they can believe, and do, anything.
8 posted on 12/22/2003 9:35:41 AM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Publius
When we pour that white-hot lead up his keister, he'll sing like Whitney Houston.,

Is that why she sounds like that?

9 posted on 12/22/2003 9:39:08 AM PST by Protagoras (Hating Democrats doesn't make you a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Saddam should be deprived of sleep, loaded up with truth serum, kept isolated and underfed, confronted with noise - whatever it takes.

NAA! Just load up Janet Reno, Madeline Albright and Helen Thomas with strong coffee, viagra and twinkies, and send those three into Saddam's cell to give him a 72-hour lapdance to the music of Susan Estrich singing, "Kung-Fu Fighting."

Saddam'll talk.

10 posted on 12/22/2003 9:40:10 AM PST by RandallFlagg ("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
"NAA! Just load up Janet Reno, Madeline Albright and Helen Thomas with strong coffee, viagra and twinkies, and send those three into Saddam's cell to give him a 72-hour lapdance to the music of Susan Estrich singing, "Kung-Fu Fighting."


GOOD GRIEF!!! Are you some kind of sadomasa...whatever you call it?!? That's some preeeetty heavy torture you're recommending!

11 posted on 12/22/2003 9:44:58 AM PST by Maria S ("…the end is near…this time, Americans are serious; Bush is not like Clinton." Uday Hussein 4/9/03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Maria S
What's even more frightening would be to figure out what compensation would be needed to give to those three to do that particular deed for their nation.

------------shudder

12 posted on 12/22/2003 9:48:34 AM PST by RandallFlagg ("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Publius
When we pour that white-hot lead up his keister, he'll sing like Whitney Houston...

OMG, that is just sooo beautiful. (sniff)

13 posted on 12/22/2003 9:50:37 AM PST by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maria S
Maria, ROTFLMAO ! I have posted such fantasies here before and have been called sick, I am glad someone else has my sense of humor! Oh, you forgot to mention Hillary should go with them !
14 posted on 12/22/2003 10:06:08 AM PST by taildragger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I was wondering why the NY Daily News, which is owned and run by leftist friends of the clintons, would run this story,

With all due respect, while Zuckerman himself is liberal,the editors are former aids to Guiliani, and Zuckerman himself has ties also to the republicans and the daily news was going to endorese Rudy over Hillary for the senate, unfortunatley Rudy got cancer and dropped out (he wasn't running a very good campaign anyway).

I've seen them endorese candiates from both the left and right. The best way to describe the daily news is slightly left of center, but generally around the middle. They also endoresed going to war with iraq.

15 posted on 12/22/2003 10:51:33 AM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Publius
When we pour that white-hot lead up his keister, he'll sing like Whitney Houston.

Torture isn't the best idea. If we were going to torture him for revenge, fine, I'm all for it, but if we use hard torture, for info, we'll get junk. He'll say whatever the hell he thinks we want to hear and just jibberish.

16 posted on 12/22/2003 10:59:10 AM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
OMG! I actually put that visual together and got a stomach ache. You are one sick puppy ;-)
17 posted on 12/22/2003 11:00:44 AM PST by moodyskeptic (weekend warrior in the culture war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: knighthawk
Good find. Wow, has O'Reilly done a 180 or what? Just a few weeks ago he was shouting down a guest on his show and insisting there was NO link between Hussein and 9/11. Lots of us knew better, but O'Reilly was pontificating mightily about the lack of a link.
20 posted on 12/22/2003 2:13:43 PM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson