1 posted on
12/22/2003 8:49:39 AM PST by
UnklGene
To: UnklGene
Seems more aptly titled "Clark's Sensability Gap".
2 posted on
12/22/2003 9:14:28 AM PST by
theDentist
(Tagline deamed un-inhabitable. Condemned. New Location sought....)
To: UnklGene
There remained rumors of some kind of French connection," he adds darkly, "rumors that have been denied vigorously by Paris." Gosh, we sure have a fine ally in France, don't we < /sarcasm mode off?
3 posted on
12/22/2003 9:14:43 AM PST by
Hodar
(With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
To: UnklGene
So what will he say, a questioner asks, when the Bush camp levels the obvious criticism: If General Clark had his way, Saddam Hussein would still be in power. "If General Clark had his way," the candidate instantly replies, "we'd have had Osama bin Laden dead or alive two years ago, and the world would have been a lot safer. And then we'd have used the United Nations to go after Saddam Hussein the right way." Well, at least we don't have to worry about the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade anymore.
-PJ
To: UnklGene
Clark's credibility gap
It's a credibility VOID! Or a vacuum.
(with apologies to Jeff Jacoby, who is a great columnist)
5 posted on
12/22/2003 9:50:33 AM PST by
VOA
To: UnklGene
General Clark is a man of low character and no integrity. He will do anything and say anything to get what he wants. That makes him a VERY dangerous man.
6 posted on
12/22/2003 9:58:21 AM PST by
pgkdan
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson