Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy Announces Ohio Class SSGN Conversion Contract Award
United States Department of Defense ^ | December 18, 2003 | Media Dept. Pentagon

Posted on 12/21/2003 2:46:49 PM PST by Calpernia

General Dynamics Electric Boat Corp. (GD/EB) is being awarded a cost plus incentive fee contract worth $222 million for the conversion of the first Ohio Class Guided Missile Submarine (SSGN), USS Ohio (SSGN 726), and for Long Lead Time Material (LLTM) and Conversion Installation Planning for the Conversion of Ohio Class Ballistic Missile Submarines (SSBNs), the USS Michigan (SSBN 727) and the USS Georgia (SSBN 729), to SSGN 727 and SSGN 729.

Emphasizing the importance of SSGNs, Secretary of the Navy Gordon R. England, said, “The SSGN is an example of the Navy's innovative transformation that supports our joint warfighters. With well over 20 years of life remaining, the SSGN conversion will significantly increase the strike capability and the flexibility of our special forces."

Today’s award modifies a contract with GD/EB originally awarded on Sept. 26, 2002, for SSGN detail design, long lead time material, and conversion planning. The contract modification includes a cost plus incentive fee contract for the conversion of SSGN 726 and a cost plus fixed fee contract with performance incentive fee for the installation planning and LLTM for SSGN 727 and SSGN 729. The contract also provides priced options totaling $152 million for the fiscal 2004 Conversion of SSBN 728, the USS Florida to SSGN 728 and for the completion of Conversion Installation Planning for SSGN 729.

Under an innovative teaming arrangement, the SSGN conversions are being conducted in conjunction with engineered refueling overhauls (EROs) performed by Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Norfolk Naval Shipyard. GD/EB is the SSGN conversion manager, and provides labor and manufactured components to support conversion execution. The Naval Shipyards perform the EROs, remove affected equipment and provide services and labor to support GD/EB.

Speaking about this contract, Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition John J. Young Jr., said, “This agreement shares risk equitably between the government and industry, and it provides strong incentives to GD/EB to assist the return of these vital submarines to the fleet on an aggressive schedule. The conversion teaming arrangement implemented by this contract best uses the experience, facilities, and labor of government and industry to provide an unprecedented capability to the nation.”

Upon completion of their conversions, the SSGNs will be able to carry up to 154 Tomahawk missiles and to function as the host platform for 66 special operations forces (SOF). SSGN 726 began its ERO at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard in November 2002, and began conversion work in November 2003. SSGN 728 began its ERO at Norfolk Naval Shipyard in August 2003, with conversion start planned in April 2004. Both the SSGN 726 and the SSGN 728 will complete conversion in fiscal 2006.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: contracts; defensespending; generaldynamics; missilesubmarine; ohioclass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 12/21/2003 2:46:50 PM PST by Calpernia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Ohio Class

2 posted on 12/21/2003 2:53:31 PM PST by PokeyJoe (Proudly replying to see how long I can keep it up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PokeyJoe
At least we'll finally have some real SSGN's although I hate losing four SSBN's.
3 posted on 12/21/2003 2:55:43 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
This is a great way to convert cold war resources to support the war on terrorists. Very low profile in the waters off a rogue state, then WHAM! BANG! Libya made the correct choice!
4 posted on 12/21/2003 2:55:59 PM PST by SubMareener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Upon completion of their conversions, the SSGNs will be able to carry up to 154 Tomahawk missiles and to function as the host platform for 66 special operations forces...

Criminy, an entire invasion force in one vessel.

5 posted on 12/21/2003 2:56:48 PM PST by Professional Engineer (pssst Hey Kid, wanna be a Rocket Scientist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
It was either this, or scrap them all together. So it is a net win.
6 posted on 12/21/2003 2:57:04 PM PST by SubMareener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PokeyJoe
"Under an innovative teaming arrangement, the SSGN conversions are being conducted in conjunction with engineered refueling overhauls (EROs) performed by Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Norfolk Naval Shipyard."

My buddy is on this team from here in Bremerton. This is saving big $$$$ and lopping off many hours of conversion time.

7 posted on 12/21/2003 3:03:32 PM PST by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener
It also will mean a reduction in very expensive
Carrier battle groups. The next step will be to ramp up
sub launched UCAV's with autonomous refueling capability.

It will make carriers obsolete as battleships.
8 posted on 12/21/2003 3:04:26 PM PST by tcuoohjohn (Follow The Money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener
It was either this, or scrap them all together. So it is a net win.

Yeah, I know but I hate losing any boomers. They're the best deterrent force in the world and I say the more the better.

9 posted on 12/21/2003 3:06:55 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
With 4 SSGN's, each capable of carring 154 Cruise Missiles, I wonder what their going to do with all of the VLS 688's and the new Virginia Class SSN's?
10 posted on 12/21/2003 3:11:43 PM PST by SolitaryMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
Yes, but if they are smart they can deploy a new supersonic cruise missle that is now under development. With a nuclear warhead this sub could be easily brought back as a strategic weapon platform. Also, there is a nuke for the ATACM (we are not suppose to know this) which they are deploying to use as a theater ballistic missle in this boat. So perhaps it is not the loss you might think. Still we should have built the 24 (or was it 28?) Tridents that Reagan proposed when we had the chance.

I still say that by 2012 or so the big political battle will be to rebuild our strategic forces and to rethink our posture. Watch for the Dems (or whatever they will be calling themselve by then) to try to sabotage this force. With growing nuclear blocks (China, India, BRazil and maybe Germany) we will have to build a much more robust deterrent that we have now, and this strategic force will have to have a much wider range of options. It was a grave mistake to halt nuclear weapon research a decade ago when we had such a lead.

If these emerging blocks come together against us we must be prepared to think the unthinkable and be prepared to wage and win a nuclear world war across several continents.

11 posted on 12/21/2003 3:20:11 PM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SolitaryMan
It does not effect those platforms. Theses conversions cover a variety of weopnes, not just cruise missles. For example, they can carry all the ATACM army ballistic missles. It is really quite a smart move, IMHO.
12 posted on 12/21/2003 3:25:31 PM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CasearianDaoist
We definitely need a new cruise missile. The TLAM/TASM is obsolete and an enemy with decent air defenses could shoot them down. The Russians have plenty of supersonic cruise missiles that even our Aegis system might not be able to stop of enough were fired. It's the one area the Russians have better weapons than we do.

The Ohio's will be be doing their job for several more decades but our ICBM force is going to need replacement starting around 2020 at the very latest. We're retiring the Peacekeeper (MX) ICBM and soon all our Minuteman III's will be de-MIRVed and armed with the warheads removed from the Peacekeepers.

Either we're going to have to build new SSBN's or a new ICBM. I vote for both.

13 posted on 12/21/2003 3:25:48 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SolitaryMan
Reference #10:

My contacts in the business tell me this is the way of the future. In 20 years, each submarine will have the capability to perform special ops, strike land targets with missiles, and perform conventional sea denial missions.

As an old bubblehead myself, I can only say "KEWL"
14 posted on 12/21/2003 3:32:34 PM PST by judicial meanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
All of our systems are de-mirved now, or so I thought. There is a replacement for the Minuteman in the works now. It is really unclear just how real the Russian supersonic cruise missle threat has been, though the new developments with India are disturbing, I will grant you. I think the current naval systems can stop them thought they need to add another cruiser and a couple of missle frigates to each battle group. THe proposed CGX/DDX platforms are truely immpressive, though they are a few years out. There are plans in the works for a series of supersonic cruise missle that way outclass the current russian ones (one of these is spec's out a mach 7)

I am really upset about the partiot being taken offline. I think that that was a big mistake. I hope that they have done it in such a way as to quickly bring them back on line. That system was lightyears beyond what the Russians had. It is hard to know where the thought is going on this in the DOD as this area it so "black" and they put out so much disinformation. I hope that the Republican party is aware of the political risks and will prepare the nation to make some strong choices in the years ahead. I fully believe that a large scale nuclear war will be fought in the next 30 to 50 years. We must prepare ourselves. Bush's push on missle defence and high energy weapons is a good start. It would prove to be a shrewd move if we got that working well first and then did the weopons build out when the shield is in place. It might be the only way to do the build out now - otherwise someone would just hit us first.

People bitch about Bush "abandoning Taiwan" but I think that such notions spring from a lack of knowledge and supperficial thinking. The only thing keeping us alive now is the lack of throw weight out there and the sense that Bush would push the buttons. Get in a weak President anytime soon and our strategic posture soes not look to good.

15 posted on 12/21/2003 3:46:25 PM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CasearianDaoist
I'm not sure if all the Minuteman III's are de-MIRVed but I know the process is well under way. They could already be finished and my information is just a little out of date. I do wish we had waited to retire the Peacekeepers until the Russians had retired all of their MIRVed R-36MUTTH/R-36M2 (SS-18/Satan) and UR-100NUTTH (SS-19/Stilleto) ICBM's.

As a bit of news, Russia has just activated a new regiment of Topol-M (SS-27/Sickle) ICBM's.

16 posted on 12/21/2003 4:15:31 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
I know, it is scary. I do not trust the russians one bit. I hope that we are cheating a little too. As I said before, we must be prepared for this. It will happen someday. Have we taken all of the partiots off line? I only know of one that actually went offline. I have a feeling that Bush and Co. will not do anything stupid. Get a Dem in there and it could be the end of us.
17 posted on 12/21/2003 4:54:25 PM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CasearianDaoist
I'm not to worried about the Russians starting something with us since the concept of MAD still applies. They don't want to die any more than we do. It's funny, when we were able to review the KGB files after the Soviet Union fell, it turned out that they had the same opinion of us as we did of them. Both sides thought the other was crazy enough to start a full scale nuclear war but felt that they did not want to be the ones to initiate it. It is ironic that they were as scared of us as we were of them.

If there is going to be a nuclear exchange, I believe that it will be either India-Pakistan or on the Korean Peninsula.

Have we taken all of the partiots off line?

I'm assuming you're talking about the anti-missile Patriot system?

18 posted on 12/21/2003 5:27:37 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
I meant peacekeepers, sorry about that.
19 posted on 12/21/2003 5:47:28 PM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CasearianDaoist
There are still Peacekeepers deployed and ready to fly if needed. If the Air Force stays on schedule, the last Peacekeeper will be retired in late 2005 or early 2006. Until that occurs, it means there will still be some MIRVed Minuteman III's.
20 posted on 12/21/2003 5:52:55 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson