Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tray-sea
I think the current threat is by far the highest probability since 9-11-01.

Here is some key info:

"In September, the government raised the bar for changing the threat level, saying it would only elevate the status if there was specific and credible information about an attack."

If they raised the bar, that means that now they do have strong specific information, maybe based on the old definition we would be at red alert.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/12/22/TERROR.TMP
1,142 posted on 12/21/2003 7:54:12 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1137 | View Replies ]


To: FairOpinion
I agree, but also consider that the motivation of the enemy to pump false "chatter" into the intel stream is at its highest now given the recent successes for the US. so it cuts both ways. let's see what kind of stories surface over the next couple of days.
1,143 posted on 12/21/2003 7:56:23 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1142 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
I heard this also and how Bush hesitated strongly issuing in this alert due to the "Cry Wolf" syndrome we went through. Idiot George Tenet suggested raising it two weeks ago (for once I agreed with him) and we all know it would not be raised without substantial proof to the President and his Threat Matrix advisors.
1,229 posted on 12/22/2003 12:18:40 AM PST by JustPiper (Following the course of least resistance makes for crooked rivers and crooked men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson