Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thomas Jefferson Found Guilty in Mock Trial!
Associated Press/Yahoo ^ | 12/21/03 | CAIN BURDEAU

Posted on 12/20/2003 11:26:07 PM PST by Dallas59

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
So what?
1 posted on 12/20/2003 11:26:09 PM PST by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
He is the founder of the demo rat party what more would you expect, along with Jackson, probably did more to enslave people and practice genocide that any other president, except FDR.
2 posted on 12/20/2003 11:28:21 PM PST by dts32041 ("Taxes are not levied for the benefit of the taxed" RAH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
I'd like to ask Scalia, "Don't you have anything better to do?"

Jefferson is turning in his grave knowing what the Democrat party has become.

3 posted on 12/20/2003 11:30:27 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
"Scalia didn't utter a word during the trial, and agreed with a nod — after consultation with the bench — to the verdict: Jefferson guilty, Napoleon innocent."

Hmm...I wonder why she chose not to be on record? She was there and agreed.
How much money did this cost? And for what may I ask? Sounds like good old Jefferson was in the Hague under a UN war crimes tribunal. See, this PROVES the USA is the bad guy.

4 posted on 12/20/2003 11:41:37 PM PST by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
So this Francophone society or whatever it is sided with Napoleon Bonaparte over Thomas Jefferson - what a surprise! I don't think members of the Federal government like Justice Scalia should be encouraging the use of alternative languages in the US, on that point Jefferson was completely correct.
5 posted on 12/20/2003 11:41:52 PM PST by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
Thomas Jefferson was a left handed weiner.
6 posted on 12/20/2003 11:42:41 PM PST by familyop (Essayons - motto of good, stable psychotics with a purpose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
Jefferson is turning in his grave knowing what the Democrat party has become.

Looking at our bleeding borders and the endless flood of millions of illegals pouring into our country, Jefferson would probably march on Washington DC and hold both of the two party cartels at musket point.

7 posted on 12/20/2003 11:47:35 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
Didn't Jefferson say something about slavery that went like this. "Slavery is like holding a wolf by the ears, you don't like it, but you don't dare let go".

I expect the next revisionist trial will be that of Eli Whitney, the evil twisted genius inventor of the cotton gin. He knew that in order to sew slavery firmly into the fabric of the South that a cheaper method of removing the seeds was crucial. An unnamed source in the district attorney's office has confirmed that Jefferson is going to testify at Whitney's trial. His testimony against Whitney and as yet uncharged and unnamed defendants is expected to result in a reduced sentence for Jefferson.
8 posted on 12/20/2003 11:53:54 PM PST by DeepDish (Let your keyboard do the walking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
Ya. BFD.
9 posted on 12/20/2003 11:56:39 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
Please send me all your nickels and two dollar bills and I will dispose of them properly for all freepers.
10 posted on 12/20/2003 11:59:04 PM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeepDish
Jefferson was dead at the time of the trail of tears. Dumb question.
11 posted on 12/21/2003 12:04:55 AM PST by BillSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
Quelle merde fieffé...
12 posted on 12/21/2003 12:14:27 AM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
Does anyone seriously believe the learned and clear-headed Jefferson would be a Demorat today?
13 posted on 12/21/2003 12:14:55 AM PST by luvbach1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix
Hmm...I wonder why she chose not to be on record? She was there and agreed.

Who? Mr. Antonin Scalia?

14 posted on 12/21/2003 12:15:49 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DeepDish
Why not posthumously condemn the founding fathers to capital punishment and quiet the revisonists? On second thought that would not quiet them, so founding fathers, live on!
15 posted on 12/21/2003 12:18:07 AM PST by luvbach1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
I don't know what the writer is trying to convey, except to try to re-write history to continually tear down our forebearers in any way possible. There can be only one source of such malcontent and devious behavior, and it smacks of the socialist/communist desire to destroy all things American. They're coming for all of it...the guns, the churches, the unborn...and our forebearers as well.

But, if mr. cutie thinks it's so grand to "try" someone from another century, when everything was perceived in a different light...I'd like to invent a time machine, and try this author back in Mr. Jefferson's time and world.

I wonder what historians will think of our time in a couple hundred years?

Perhaps they will list our politically incorrect attrocities, like abortion, drugs, and other unthinkables today and pass a sentence on us.

My question is, does the statutes of limitations EVER run out on political correctness, or is it just someone else looking for an "angle" to have some outlet for the journalism degree that Mom and Dad mortgaged their house to provide many of the no-talented trying to become Clark Kent and Lois Lane?
16 posted on 12/21/2003 12:24:14 AM PST by FrankR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
Great point. Most leftists who condemn history tend to strip it from the context in which the events transpired. I hold no respect for this PC thuggery; to say it is contemptible would be a gross understatement.
17 posted on 12/21/2003 12:47:19 AM PST by APFel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
Go Warren aka Zeus!! Acadianne toujors.
18 posted on 12/21/2003 1:23:53 AM PST by Atchafalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Ooops! My VERY bad! When I read Supreme Court Justice and the way tone of the the story was I instantly thought O'Connor! That story of her in Atlanta and US vs International Law.....my blood pressure is rising again, thank you!
19 posted on 12/21/2003 1:29:51 AM PST by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1
"Why not posthumously condemn the founding fathers to capital punishment and quiet the revisonists?"

That is the next step. It reminds me of an Englishman whose name I cannot recall whose corpse was disinterred and burned years after his death. I think he was an early church reformer/theologian (pre Luther}.
20 posted on 12/21/2003 2:07:19 AM PST by DeepDish (Let your keyboard do the walking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson