[Lurker]

I didn't mean to be so abrupt, but what the heck is Glock doing reinventing the frigging wheel?

If they really wanted to 'accomodate' .45 shooters, why didn't they just make it a single stack weapon using the proven Glock action? What's the point in inventing a "new" .45 caliber round? What was wrong with the 'old' one?

While I'm not a personal fan of it, Glock has managed to secure a huge portion of the market with the action they invented. If Glock shooters wanted a smaller version of the pistol chambered in .45 ACP, that's what they should have given them.

But hey, that's just me.

Merry Christmas my friend.

Regards,

L

[Squantos]

If truth and honest opinion is abrupt I'll take that over warm and fuzzy lies anyday. That's why I like freepers for the most part.

I think Aston wanted his own version of a "caliber" like the 357SIG or 40 S&W (aka Short & Whimpy)............thus the trendy 45GAP..........all smoke and mirrors. But of course I am a member of the gun of the month club thus will get one to line my gun safe with and test fer myself !........... 1911A1 rules !

Stay Safe and call em like ya see em friend !

[SevenDaysInMay]

This could be a move towards the non-lethal handgun.

The GAP "Short", primer + ~1 grain of powder, could put out an eye, if the shooter weren't careful.

Cor-Bon may soon introduce their .40 cal. bottleneck version to increase feeding manners.

What we need is less proof that engineers masterbate.