1 posted on
12/19/2003 2:31:48 AM PST by
kattracks
To: kattracks
if Dean is nominated, will Lieberman endorse him over Bush?
2 posted on
12/19/2003 2:46:34 AM PST by
arielb
To: kattracks
Somehow, despite the fact that I liked this article, the term "Democratic think tank" sounds like an oxymoron.
4 posted on
12/19/2003 4:14:17 AM PST by
alwaysconservative
(The only bad thing about liberal emperors wearing no clothes is their personal hygiene is so bad.)
To: kattracks
bump
6 posted on
12/19/2003 5:44:35 AM PST by
jonno
To: kattracks
Inability to understand the War on Terror .
Repeat after me.....
To: kattracks
Some Democrats see all this clearly. Sen. Zell Miller says in his new book, A National Party No More, that Democrats now pandering to the Left are exacerbating the difficulties of a nation at war. . . . Howard Dean, while not alone, is the worst offender. Hmmmmm.
Let's just suppose, by some strange occurrence, a deadlocked Democratic convention chose Zell Miller to be their candidate.
What would happen then? Could he be "a contenduh"....?
Cheers!
- John
To: kattracks
Can someone post that picture. I saw one not too long ago and thought: All the RNC or Bush campaign has to do is put this picture on the air without any audio--and Dean's goose is cooked.
Would that be against the Supreme Courts new vision of the Constitutional right to criticize candidates, I wonder?
12 posted on
12/19/2003 1:40:04 PM PST by
wildbill
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson