Skip to comments.
Sept. 11 Panel: Bush, Clinton Not to Blame - No Evidence to Blame Clinton or Bush Administrations
ABCNEWS.COM ^
Posted on 12/18/2003 4:39:17 PM PST by Sub-Driver
Sept. 11 Panel: Bush, Clinton Not to Blame Sept. 11 Commission Chairman Says There's No Evidence to Blame Clinton or Bush Administrations
The Associated Press
WASHINGTON Dec. 18 The chairman of a federal commission looking into the Sept. 11 attacks said Thursday that mistakes over many years left the United States vulnerable to such an attack, but he resisted pinning blame on either of the last two presidential teams. "We have no evidence that anybody high in the Clinton administration or the Bush administration did anything wrong," chairman Thomas Kean said in an interview with ABC's "Nightline" taped for airing Thursday night.
Kean said the 10-member National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States has not decided whether to ask former President Clinton or President Bush to testify. He also said that any conclusions about the performance of high-level officials "will be reached when we are finished with our job, not now."
Kean sought to clarify remarks attributed to him in a CBS News report that aired Wednesday.
In the CBS interview, Kean said the commission's report, due May 27, will detail "what wasn't done and what should have be done" to prevent the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
He added, "There are people that, if I was doing the job, would certainly not be in the position they were in at that time because they failed."
CBS reported that Kean's comments constituted "pointing fingers inside the (Bush) administration and laying blame."
On Thursday, Democratic presidential candidate Wesley Clark labeled Kean's statements "disturbing" and said they showed the Bush administration could have done more to protect America from a terrorist attack.
Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., said Kean's comments meant "that Bush administration officials had valuable information that could have prevented the terrorist attacks."
But Kean said in Thursday's interview that he did not mean to suggest that certain federal officials should have been fired after Sept. 11. He said he was commenting on obvious mistakes that were made, such as letting terrorists into the country and letting dangerous items onto planes.
"There are a number of steps along the way, that if they had occurred differently, this event wouldn't have occurred," he said.
White House press secretary Scott McClellan said he reviewed the CBS report and did not believe Kean leveled accusations against the Bush administration.
"There is nothing that we have seen that leads us to believe that Sept. 11 could have been prevented," McClellan said.
Kean, a former Republican governor of New Jersey, was appointed by Bush to lead the bipartisan commission.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911commission; blame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-156 next last
To: Sub-Driver
Doesn't matter now. He said what he said to CBS, and the Dems are going to run with it. Wait and see.
2
posted on
12/18/2003 4:42:18 PM PST
by
squidly
(Although prepared for martyrdom, I prefer that it be postponed.)
To: squidly
He said what he said to CBS, and the Dems are going to run with it. Wait and see. Nobody will believe it. Wait and see.
3
posted on
12/18/2003 4:44:10 PM PST
by
sinkspur
(Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
To: Sub-Driver
And yesterday SeeBS was reporting that Kean siad that the Bush Administration was to blame
4
posted on
12/18/2003 4:44:12 PM PST
by
MJY1288
(The Democrats Have Reached Rock Bottom and The Digging Continues)
To: Sub-Driver
I figured as much. Some people saw the spin CBS put on their story and went nuts. I did too at first, until I read a little closer. Goes to show how effective media bias can be.
5
posted on
12/18/2003 4:45:00 PM PST
by
MattAMiller
(Saddam has been brought to justice in my name. How about yours?)
To: squidly
So, he was just being a jerk, not malicious? This guy was a lifetime politician. I can't believe he wouldn't understand what CBS would do with his comments.
6
posted on
12/18/2003 4:45:33 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Sub-Driver
So Clinton is not to blame? How about the times he had a chance to get Osama, and didn't?
7
posted on
12/18/2003 4:46:04 PM PST
by
MizSterious
(First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
To: Sub-Driver
Kean must figure that he's done enough damage for now, so it's time to get back to cover. The seed has been planted for laying all blame for 9/11 at the feet of the Bush Administration - now it's up to the media and the Rats to make sure it bears fruit, and they will spare no effort or expense.
8
posted on
12/18/2003 4:46:14 PM PST
by
CFC__VRWC
(AIDS, abortion, euthanasia - don't liberals just kill ya?)
To: sinkspur
Nobody will believe it. Wait and see.People who want to believe it will. People who don't won't.
9
posted on
12/18/2003 4:47:01 PM PST
by
squidly
(Although prepared for martyrdom, I prefer that it be postponed.)
To: Sub-Driver
it looks more like CBS sifted comments for anti-Bush material out of context and ran with it.
10
posted on
12/18/2003 4:47:40 PM PST
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: squidly
Oh, they may try, but no one will believe it (save the 10% fringe of the whacko democrat left that believes Bush is worse than satan). Like Madelaine Albrights comments about Osama being hidden until is is politically expedient to reveal his capture, suggestions that the Bush administration had prior knowledge of 9/11 is dismissed as lunacy. In fact, I believe it backfires on anyone who makes such a claim.
11
posted on
12/18/2003 4:47:56 PM PST
by
Rokke
To: Sub-Driver
"There are a number of steps along the way, that if they had occurred differently, this event wouldn't have occurred," he said. Sure, if NYC had not built the WTC, if Boeing had not built the airplanes, if the Wright Brothers had not invented airplanes, if Columbus had not .....
What totally bogus statement!
12
posted on
12/18/2003 4:48:47 PM PST
by
Michael.SF.
('By any means necessary' - Black Panthers,Chomsky, Clintonista's, the Democrats)
To: squidly
You're right...he said it and no one's going to listen to his clarifications....can't take it back.....Hey Kean, STFU until your little investigation is over.
13
posted on
12/18/2003 4:48:54 PM PST
by
mystery-ak
(Mike...Have Yourself A Merry Little Christmas...)
To: Sub-Driver
Clinton could have had Bin Laden grabbed years before. He passed up the opportunity.
Clinton could have resisted the urge to deny the CIA and FBI the right to share data. He didn't.
Clinton could have instructed his intellegence people to pursue the concept of Project Bjoinka, to see if there was any meat in it. He didn't, as far as we know.
While I will not go as far as blaming Clinton for 9/11; he didn't fly the planes into the buildings after all, I have no problem opining that if he were more concerned with American security than what was going on underneath his desk recent history would be significantly altered.
Bottom line:
Clinton waffled and ignored the problem, Bush stood up and took action to eliminate the problem. And the world is a better place today because Barbara's son did. Period.
14
posted on
12/18/2003 4:49:43 PM PST
by
mitchbert
(Facts are Stubborn Things)
To: finnman69
it looks more like CBS sifted comments for anti-Bush material out of context and ran with it. And Newsmax also jumped on the band wagon for sensationalist reporting.
15
posted on
12/18/2003 4:50:27 PM PST
by
Michael.SF.
('By any means necessary' - Black Panthers,Chomsky, Clintonista's, the Democrats)
To: Sub-Driver
The "useful idiots" will spout this stuff from the rooftops. Many will believe it. It's unfortunate, but true.
16
posted on
12/18/2003 4:50:41 PM PST
by
Aeronaut
(In my humble opinion, the new expression for backing down from a fight should be called 'frenching')
To: mitchbert
Clinton could have had Bin Laden grabbed years before. He passed up the opportunity.Yes, that probably would have prevented 9/11.
But the problem was deeper than that, and it goes back years before that, too. Gerald Ford began the wussification of the CIA, and political correctness has been allowed to dictate our policies in immigration, intelligence, and foreign affairs ever since.
The problem was systemic. In fact, it was codified.
All of us allowed this to happen by our failure to prevent it.
CBS and others want to blame it on Bush for obvious political reasons. But it's not completely accurate to blame it all on Clinton, either.
An entire generation of American policy and attitude is the real reason why we didn't have the ability to prevent the attack.
17
posted on
12/18/2003 4:55:48 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: mitchbert
Al Gore's comission that was formed after TWA 800, could of implemented their more extensive airport screenings.
Instead they nuckled under to the evil corporations and blew it off. Sounds like something the Republicans would be blamed for.
18
posted on
12/18/2003 4:55:59 PM PST
by
revtown
To: Aeronaut
Let them. They certainly have a long list. Yellow cake, imminent threat, the photos of Bush sold for $, Enron, the carrier landing, the Baghdad visit, the Axis of Evil, the Patriot Act, the list is almost endless. And most thinking Americans don't buy any of it.
To: Sub-Driver
With Benveniste (sp?) and Gorelick on the panel, it is inherently untrustworthy.
20
posted on
12/18/2003 4:58:17 PM PST
by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-156 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson