Skip to comments.
How the M-1 Became a Fuel Hog
Strategypage.com ^
| 12-18-03
| AJ Wagner
Posted on 12/18/2003 2:11:03 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
To: magslinger
There is no diesel engine involved. I think you missed the earlier post. We were talking about a Swedish tank that has a reserve diesel for lagering and other low-speed conditions to save fuel, but kicks in the turbine for high-speed operations. They apparently use the same shaft, with the turbine spinning free during diesel power, and hopefully a disconnect from the diesel during turbine power (diesel @ 30,000 RPM?). My question was about the transmission in the end which has to deal with an RPM range of almost 30,000, where even high-end sports cars only have 13,000 and only a fraction of the torque. Maybe they just kick in one monster step-down gear when using the turbine.
To: antiRepublicrat
The issue in post #25 was speed reduction in the order of 10:1. No diesel back-up is involved in the M1 or helicopters (see post #40 immediately after yours).
42
posted on
12/19/2003 7:50:42 AM PST
by
expatpat
To: KrisKrinkle
A mounted, well-trained US armoured brigade with a modicum of air support and decent intel cannot be defeated by any non-nuclear OPFOR on the earth today. Even the Chinese can't do it without taking huge losses.
43
posted on
12/19/2003 8:09:39 AM PST
by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitor)
To: antiRepublicrat
There does exist an APU that be hung off the rear quarter of an M1-A1. I cannot speak to its usefulness or adoption by the tankers.
44
posted on
12/19/2003 8:10:38 AM PST
by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitor)
To: antiRepublicrat
I think you missed the earlier post. We were talking about a Swedish tank... I did kind of skip over that part.
45
posted on
12/19/2003 8:43:55 AM PST
by
magslinger
(You're not fully dressed without a sidearm.)
To: expatpat
The issue in post #25 was speed reduction in the order of 10:1. No diesel back-up is involved in the M1 or helicopters (see post #40 immediately after yours). Go further back to post #6 about using the Swedish hybrid design in the M1 to save fuel.
To: Orangedog
47
posted on
12/19/2003 10:08:39 AM PST
by
archy
(Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
To: CHICAGOFARMER
The Crusader howitzer is dead, done, gone, zip, nata. Maybe the Germans will sell us some Haubitze 2000s. Or we can get some 2S19 MSTA-Ss from our good Russian friends.
48
posted on
12/19/2003 10:20:41 AM PST
by
archy
(Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
To: Cannoneer No. 4
Please add me to the Treadhead ring ...
49
posted on
12/19/2003 10:24:07 AM PST
by
BlueLancer
(Der Elite Møøsenspåånkængrüppen ØberKømmååndø (EMØØK))
To: Dead Dog
Sounds like a little false idle-atry going on. :)~
50
posted on
12/19/2003 10:55:32 AM PST
by
GigaDittos
(Bumper sticker: "Vote Democrat, it's easier than getting a job.")
To: GigaDittos
The "wholly" trinity of Engineering:
Burn Gas
Go Fast
Make Noise.
51
posted on
12/19/2003 11:03:44 AM PST
by
Dead Dog
To: archy
Ewwwww...the wheeled version. How's it handle in the turns. IMO, it has the turning radius of the Nimitz, but that's kinda what I was after. You have to be tallented to get yourself killed in a Volvo.
52
posted on
12/19/2003 11:06:33 AM PST
by
Orangedog
(Remain calm...all is well! [/sarcasm])
To: expatpat
The only reason they are used on airliners is they don't lose efficiency (to the point of being ineffective) at higher speeds, they have extremely high thrust to weight (lowers Empty Weight), are capable of good performance at 30-40K ft, they burn cheaper fuel, and are much more reliable.
They used to always burn more gas then a recip counterpart, but that is changing.
53
posted on
12/19/2003 11:19:57 AM PST
by
Dead Dog
To: Darksheare
Not sure how it would work or what it would look like, but unceremoniously dropping turbines is a bad move. I guess the article writer never tried to start a cold Paladin diesel on a winter morning.. And of course not all of our M109 155 SP guns have been upgraded to the M109A6 *Paladin* standard; only around 2000 or so, last I'd heard- some National Guard units still have the M109A4 withthe short-barrel gun tube. But the very best any of them is good for is about 35MPH or so, if the flat-out German cannoncockers I've passed in convoy on the autobahn are any indication.
54
posted on
12/19/2003 11:37:41 AM PST
by
archy
(Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
To: archy
Yes.
That is, I'm afraid, correct.
And the A4's winter start procedures were even more arcane and cantankerous than the A6's if memory serves correctly.
Having been light towed, I failed to pay much attention to the SP's info and data when I should have.
55
posted on
12/19/2003 11:41:36 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(The tagline you have loaded cannot be read. Please go back and try refreshing the page again.)
To: Blueflag
You pick the weapon you want to use against a U.S. Armor Brigade. I get to pick?
I'll take a W-88 or three. Anything smaller and I can't be sure of the job...
To: Orangedog
Ewwwww...the wheeled version. How's it handle in the turns. IMO, it has the turning radius of the Nimitz, but that's kinda what I was after. You have to be tallented to get yourself killed in a Volvo.
The closest I've ever been to the Volvo S-cars is the Saab Turbo-Viggens, which I think is a sort of apples/oranges comparison. But the little Saabs handled and braked very nicely IMHO.
-archy-/-
57
posted on
12/19/2003 12:05:19 PM PST
by
archy
(Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
To: Servant of the 9
Swedish S Tank: Though older than the Abrams, pretty hot looking Tank (no turret) Never knew it had 2 engines...
To: Cannoneer No. 4
How bout refueling the tanks from copters the way fighter jets are refueled by planes... with similar already designed off the self refueling add ons to the tanks and copters.. ? i.e refueling copters.. would work for other equipment too.. eliminating tankers following closely,,
ANybody game, lets start a bizness...lol
59
posted on
12/19/2003 12:32:26 PM PST
by
hosepipe
To: hosepipe
A hovering close to the ground fuel tank....for 15 minutes sounds like a lovely RPG target...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson