Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marine major first to face charges arising from actions on prisoners
San Diego Union Tribune ^ | December 18, 2003 | Rick Rogers

Posted on 12/18/2003 11:01:42 AM PST by SamKeck

Case opens in treatment of Iraqis

CAMP PENDLETON – The first of eight cases against Marines charged with abusing – and in one case killing – Iraqi prisoners went to court here yesterday.

Maj. William Vickers is charged with failing to obey an order or regulation for allegedly allowing his men to mistreat prisoners while he was in charge of a small detention facility outside Nasiriyah, about 180 miles southeast of Baghdad.

The charges against the eight range from dereliction of duty to negligent homicide.

"This is a case, a situation about what is right and what is wrong when it comes to dealing with civilian detainees and prisoners of war when the United States is operating in a combat zone," Capt. Jamie McCall, a prosecutor in the case, said in opening statements.

Jane Siegel, Vickers' civilian defense attorney, said her client did the best he could after being stuck in a job that he was wasn't trained for and one that one else wanted.

"Vickers was just the guy who came up and got tagged for it," said Siegel, a retired Marine colonel in legal services. "No one could get any information on how to run the detention facility . . . Like any good Marine, he was trying to get the job done."

The case against Vickers, 36, is that he knew his guards were employing the "50/10 technique," in which prisoners were forced to stand for 50 minutes of every hour for 10 or more straight hours in heat sometimes topping 120 degrees.

For about six weeks starting in mid-April 2003, Vickers was in charge of the detention facility.

Former guards testified yesterday that new prisoners were handcuffed and a sandbag placed over their heads. Then they were forced to stand for hours until interrogators from the "Human Exploitation Team" arrived to question them.

After questioning, the prisoners were usually not treated like that again, they testified.

"The question is, does prolonged standing and sleep deprivation constitute a low-grade torture?" asked Maj. Mark K. Jamison, a legal officer from Camp Pendleton. "If so, usually the person in charge is responsible."

Two former guards who testified doubted that the technique used to make prisoners more likely to talk was inhumane.

"All we asked them to do was stand for a period of time," said Cpl. Otis Antoine, who was a guard for Vickers. U.S. "soldiers over there got tortured and killed, but they were just asked to stand."

The charges against Vickers and seven others arose after the death of Nagem Sadoon Hatab, a ranking Baath Party official, on June 6 at Camp Whilehorse.

An autopsy showed that Hatab, 52, died essentially from having his throat crushed.

Vickers was not in charge of the detention facility when Hatab died, but was charged, a Marine spokesman said, as a result of allegations by former guards about activities that occurred later.

He is the first of the eight Marines belonging to the 2nd Battalion, 25th Marine Regiment, a reserve unit based in New England, to have his case move forward in court. The Marines are being kept on active duty at Camp Pendleton while their cases are being handled.

Vickers' military preliminary hearing is expected to last through Friday, after which an investigative officer will recommend to 1st Marine Division commander Maj. Gen. James Mattis whether Vickers should be tried by the military.

Three of the Marine reservists already have been ordered to face special courts-martial for alleged abuse of detainees at the camp; however, they have not yet gone to court.

Hearings for the other four Marines are scheduled for January.

The current hearing is being presided over by Col. William Gallo.

For fair use only.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 25thmarines; iraqipows; marines; usmc; warcrime; williamvickers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: dpa5923
Umm, dening should read denying. Damn fingers.
21 posted on 12/19/2003 6:46:20 AM PST by dpa5923 (Small minds talk about people, normal minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: antaresequity
Can someone give me one logical reason the Marines are in charge of these detainees? This was, is, and should be a job for Army Military Police trained in police type activities...

You need to ask the SECDEF. He's the guy who cut down the troop units listed on the original plan. This is just one example of not enough troops--actually most POWs weren't even secured--they were simply let go. We didn't have enough troops to secure critical civilian facilities or lines of communication or Iraqi military bases or ammo depots or do a reeasonable job on the borders--and while we will still win in Iraq, that bad decision up front about the size of the invasion force has caused major league complications for our guys on the ground ever since.

22 posted on 12/20/2003 7:54:59 AM PST by mark502inf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Coop
I'm still looking for the so called crimes myself . I suspect this is more a case of PC judiciary action than an actual case of maltreatment or torture .
23 posted on 12/20/2003 8:01:55 AM PST by Ben Bolt ( " The Spenders " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson