Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: churchillbuff
Well, that isn't correct - - most states don't now allow "civil unions."

They're not civil unions when two adults set up legal agreements between each other. Bush is not in favor of civil unions.

You're a Bush-hater; that needs to be taken into consideration.

14 posted on 12/18/2003 9:23:28 AM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur
Guess you didn't read the article:

But he also said he will leave to states "whatever legal arrangements people want to make." Asked specifically about civil unions, he said it is a state issue "unless judicial rulings undermine the sanctity of marriage."

That left many conservatives and pro-family groups wondering just how far the president is willing to go.

"What the president said is confusing, and some will find it hard to distinguish from Howard Dean, who supported domestic partnerships in Vermont at the state level," said Gary Bauer, president of American Values, a conservative interest group.

--------

-----

Bottom line: the prez said civil unions are OK with him, as long as states- such as Dean's -- do it. I'm sorry you can't spin that fact away, but facts are stubborn things.

17 posted on 12/18/2003 9:35:54 AM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson