[Torie]

I have not read the decision, and am just spamming here really. But if this case is purely statutory, then it is not particularly interesting. It will be dealt with, without much fuss. But there are Constitutional issues lurking out there, when it comes to perpetual wars. Trust me.

[jwalsh07]

Perhaps but this decision didn't make any attempt to address them and they had an opportunity to do so.

I'm thinking a court appointed lawyer to represent scumbags in habeas hearings while barring the Ninth Circuit from engaging in same. Whaddaya tink?