To: ampat
ampat said: "Yeah, he said he was kidding or being facetious about the bazooka thing."
Can you supply more details about his response. I have received no acknowlegement of my email. For him to backtrack on "bazookas" and not "machine guns" is turning a lie into a half-lie. It continues to serve the anti-gunners.
If he did respond to what I hope is thousands of emails, then this "retraction" deserves yet another slap.
To: William Tell
I don't remember exactly what his words were but I think he said "I was KIDDING' ". I think he realized he was over the top on using "bazooka" as an example of assault weapons (since no one uses a bazooka anymore anyway) and he could have been more clear. I don't think he suports automatic weapons, and maybe he thinks assault weapons means automatic weapons, and weapons larger than small arms. He does support hunting weapons and self defense weapons for home defense, including handguns. He may, after all, be ignorant on the fine points of the new laws on assault weapons (magazine capacity, handgrip on long guns, bayonet lug,etc). I for one keep an AR-15 and .45 auto handy. I won't bring a bolt action rifle to a gun fight.
103 posted on
12/18/2003 10:38:03 AM PST by
ampat
(to)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson