Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dean Under Fire for Comments on Saddam
AP ^ | 12/17/2003

Posted on 12/17/2003 7:23:30 PM PST by Leroy S. Mort

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 12/17/2003 7:23:30 PM PST by Leroy S. Mort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
There's a good chance Dean can ride the wackytrain all the way to the nomination. He can't ride it to the White House though.
2 posted on 12/17/2003 7:26:15 PM PST by squidly (Although prepared for martyrdom, I prefer that it be postponed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort

3 posted on 12/17/2003 7:28:09 PM PST by ChadGore (http://www.howard-dean-sucks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort

4 posted on 12/17/2003 7:30:07 PM PST by I got the rope (ROTFLMAO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
Nowhere in this story is there any mention of the polls for a general election between Bush and Dean. When Clinton was in office, we heard of nothing but polls "proving" how popular Clinton was. Any who dared to criticize Clinton was portrayed as "going against the will of the American people." Now, we never hear of polls unless they show Bush dropping by one percentage point.
5 posted on 12/17/2003 7:31:17 PM PST by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 07055
Are you implying that the media is - gasp!- biased?!
6 posted on 12/17/2003 7:35:33 PM PST by Paul Atreides (Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
Is it just me or did anyone else get the impression that the author of this article was apologizing for Dean's idiocy at every corner. And in some instances glorifying it, as if absolute ignorance is a wonderfully bold thing?! Although I guess it is when your preaching to a choir of Democrats. =^D
7 posted on 12/17/2003 7:35:52 PM PST by Tempest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: squidly; MeeknMing
"When he used the Confederate flag to talk about courting Southern white Democrats, party leaders said the gaffe would knock him from his perch. Instead, he changed the subject by nailing down two surprise union endorsements."


8 posted on 12/17/2003 7:36:50 PM PST by Happy2BMe (2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
It's a nice dodge, actually, trying to restrict the subject to the capture of Saddam when the real subject in question was what danger he constituted when he was in power. It is that, after all, that Dean has been questioning - the fact that Saddam hadn't been apprehended yet was a popular Democrat taunt, but nowhere near as dangerous as leaving him in power (as Dean's policies would clearly prefer), would have been. But the game here is a little transparent - sneer that it was important that he hadn't been caught when that was advantageous, and sneer that it wasn't important when he had been caught and it ceased to be advantageous. This doesn't rise to the level of hypocrisy, it is simply blatantly two-faced.

The topic is, and ought to be, whether Americans are safer with Saddam out of power than they were with him in power. Given his known linkages with a spectrum of terrorists, his history of bloody invasions of two of his neighbors, and his track record in employing chemical weaponry, I don't honestly think that anyone not in a serious state of denial for ulterior reasons could say that Americans are not safer now. Iraqis certainly are.

9 posted on 12/17/2003 7:37:47 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
Thats the measure now..."Since Saddam was captured, do YOU feel any safer?" "Well, no? then, it was a failure!"
10 posted on 12/17/2003 7:39:11 PM PST by Guillermo (Shoot me if you ever see me on a Kobe Bryant, Michael Jackson or Scott Peterson thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
``Dean is saying what a whole lot of people think, and that is a guy running from hole to hole is not a major threat to our country,''

Therefore, Osama bin Laden is not a major threat to our country.

11 posted on 12/17/2003 7:41:30 PM PST by TruthShallSetYouFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
fortunately for us, this will not be the last stupid thing that man says.
So far, he has not gone 3 days without making some huge gaffe.
12 posted on 12/17/2003 7:45:11 PM PST by genghis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
this is the same man who supports the slaughter of 35,000,000+ Americans
13 posted on 12/17/2003 7:48:11 PM PST by InvisibleChurch (George Bailey: You call this a happy family? Why do we have to have all these kids?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

14 posted on 12/17/2003 7:50:50 PM PST by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope
Did you just read Drudge? Sharpton is ahead of Kerry and Edwards in the polls! Say what?? Al Sharpton is ahead of two SENATORS?? Mannn, if that doesn`t say it all about that party. Just the party of wack jobs, one big sicko cult. Maybe they should bring in Marion Barry as well, after all they re-elected that dude Mayor him after he was caught smoking crack. "Yeah, he`s our man!"
15 posted on 12/17/2003 7:59:21 PM PST by metalboy (I`m still waiting for the protests against Al Qaida and Saddam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 07055
Nowhere in this story is there any mention of the polls for a general election between Bush and Dean.

Of course not. It would just point out the obvious--that Dean is popular with the extremists in his party and would lose in a landslide if the election were held today. The dem nomination runoff is all about picking the best chihuahua to run in the upcoming greyhound race.

16 posted on 12/17/2003 8:07:23 PM PST by randog (Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
That's a KEEPER!
17 posted on 12/17/2003 8:17:45 PM PST by Happy2BMe (2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
Aside from labor union support, homosexuals, partial birth abortion supporters, does anyone really care about Dean?

Lets see-

In the last two years, the US has won 2 wars and liberated two countries.

There havent been any attacks in the US in that time.

The majority of Iraqis want us to stay and finish the job. In fact the Iraqi PM criticized the UN today for delaying action there and preventing Hussein from being removed years ago.

The economy is booming by any measure, GDP growth , employment is rebounding, manufacturing, durable goods, consumer confidence etc.

Saddam Hussein has been captured.

The Bush tax cuts are fueling growth and will cut deficits once employment rebounds (tax receipts go up under full employment and jobless benefits shrink). These tax cuts are very significant.

Of course theres that realistic Democrat view-

"We are losing the war on terror"

We need to repeal the Bush tax cuts and raise taxes significantly on anyone (including families) making over 87K a year (Howard Dean).

Bush and Cheney knew about 9/11. They are profiting from Haliburtons involvement with the imaginary no bid contracts that have been in place for a few years.

I'll tell you what. Silly Demorats keep going to your Deanie baby meet ups on the internet and keep rolling up your shirt sleeves. We'll just keep those checks coming and smoke your ass 40 states to 10 next November.

18 posted on 12/17/2003 8:18:34 PM PST by LongsforReagan (I cant wait until November 2004, so I can just troll and gloat over at DU endlessly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan
...smoke your ass 40 states to 10 next November.

My money's on 46-4.

19 posted on 12/17/2003 8:29:37 PM PST by randog (Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
a guy running from hole to hole is not a major threat to our country,'' said Jeff Link, an adviser to Sen. Tom Harkin

I suppose we should all chip in and buy this clown a clue:

THE REASON HE'S NOT A THREAT TO THIS COUNTRY IS BECAUSE HE'S RUNNING FROM HOLE TO HOLE!

20 posted on 12/17/2003 8:39:38 PM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson