[AppyPappy]

I still think Jim has too much exposure in this.

[Congressman Billybob]

JimRob knows what I'm talking about because he pulled the plug on the first thread, for good reason. What remains is okay.

JimRob's choice is to let the conversation continue. When and if it gets down to go/no go on the final ad, I won't have that conversation here on FR. That'll be outside on the regular Internet.

JimRob has no exposure here. I'm the point man on this mission.

John / Billybob

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

I still think Jim has too much exposure in this.

I think this CFR threatens FR pretty directly. The answer IMHO is to structure this site as "NEWS" and thus as immune from the limitations of other forms of speech.

Then fight the issue of whether FR is "journalism" just because it says so, or whether The New York Times is journalism for any other reason than that it says so. Because that is the quagmire that the First Amendment was crafted to keep the courts out of--and what CFR, and the FCC before it, put the government in.