1 posted on
12/16/2003 11:01:09 PM PST by
kattracks
To: kattracks
"People have suggested to us today..."
Common media tool: "There's a GROWING PERCEPTION around the nation... that Peter Jennings is a child-molestor"
"There's a THEORY floating out there that Dean is a crack-whore. Mind you, I don't believe this, but its an interesting theory nonetheless."
2 posted on
12/16/2003 11:08:05 PM PST by
Fenris6
To: kattracks
3 posted on
12/16/2003 11:09:19 PM PST by
Grampa Dave
(George $orea$$ has owned and controlled the Rats for decades!)
To: kattracks
Exactly why there should be no "internationalist" trial for Saddam.
Note: Brent doesn't slam P. Jennings enough. This is a nauseating, hateful statement PJ made:
In some respects, Iraqis keep telling us life is not as stable for them as it was when Saddam Hussein was in power."
Right, not as stable. After all, when Saddamn ruled Iraq, everyone knew how much their food ration would be, there was only one person to vote for, everyone knew if you didn't vote you would die, everyone understood that if one word was spoken against Saddam the consequences were torture and death... Stable, yes. Very stable.
Jennings is worse than stupid. He is a hateful, nasty man who wants to see people suffer. At this moment I am sorry to say that I hate him.
To: byteback
ping!
To: kattracks
These sociopaths live in their own quagmire of black bottomless spiritual corruption. Let's forever turn the channel and leave them there in the void of zero audience ratings.
To: kattracks
The other extreme groaning moment of Sunday night came on CBS, where Lesley Stahl landed an interview with Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Unaware she was drawing herself as a cartoon, she worried about the hospitality Saddam would receive: "Let me raise the whole question, for lack of a better term, (of) torture. Let's say he's not forthcoming. Would we deprive him of sleep, would we make it very cold where he is or very hot? Are there any restrictions on the way we treat him to get him to cooperate more than he has been?"If we REALLY wanted to torture Saddam, we'd force him to watch Leslie Stahl interviews.
10 posted on
12/16/2003 11:23:44 PM PST by
Fledermaus
(Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
To: kattracks
"In some respects, Iraqis keep telling us life is not as stable for them as it was when Saddam Hussein was in power."- Peter Jennings Ashwari
Stable, as in Saddam Hussein always getting 100% of the vote.
15 posted on
12/16/2003 11:36:08 PM PST by
Mr. Mojo
To: kattracks
Gloating is cleansing...
22 posted on
12/17/2003 1:42:17 AM PST by
lainde
To: kattracks
In some respects, Iraqis keep telling us life is not as stable for them as it was when Saddam Hussein was in power."This is not unlike the comments about Hitler and Mussolini before WWII- Hitler brought stability to Germany and Mussolini made the trains run on time. Peter just reflects the stupidity of the left.
25 posted on
12/17/2003 3:21:51 AM PST by
KeyWest
To: kattracks
In my opinion, while the coverage remained live on Sunday, say from 6AM until noon EST, the reporting remained mostly positive. However, after the live coverage ended at around noon, the anchors had time to go into their offices and read their faxes from the DNC, and the coverage started to turn. By 6PM, the spin was clearly turned on, the negative tone was easily perceived, and the common "talking points" were heard.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson