Skip to comments.
Ex-U.S. Attorney General Ready To Defend Saddam
IslamOnline.net ^
| Dec. 15 2003
| Mustafa Abdel-Halim
Posted on 12/15/2003 7:19:27 PM PST by Senator Pardek
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 321-332 next last
To: Senator Pardek
Either we believe in what we say we believe in or we are hypocrites. If we believe that a man accused of crimes is entitled to a vigorous defense then we should have no objection to anyone providing that defense. It is an affirmation of our beliefs and proof positive that our professed values are not merely hollow words and insincere postures.
201
posted on
12/15/2003 8:56:16 PM PST
by
tcuoohjohn
(Follow The Money)
To: Chad Fairbanks
he he he
202
posted on
12/15/2003 8:58:02 PM PST
by
CyberCowboy777
(We are Storming the Battlements, Razing the Arguments, Writing the Installments.)
To: All
I don't know if this has already been brouht up, i didn't bother trying to read all 200+ comments.
Remember, Ramsey Clark provided legal defense for Hussein in the past. And has accepted huge sums of money from the Hussein regime. Clark heads the IAC, and affiliate of WWP and ANSWER. Clark was organizing antiwar protests with money provided by Saddam Hussein!
203
posted on
12/15/2003 8:58:12 PM PST
by
chudogg
(www.chudogg.blogspot.com)
To: Howlin
A "We Arabs Are So Humilated" conference. LOL
I hope they have lots of whine to go with their goat's milk cheese.
204
posted on
12/15/2003 9:00:33 PM PST
by
Jeff Gordon
(Why can't we all just get along and do things my way?)
To: SouthernFreebird
I am amazed at the idea that a vigorous defense of someone accused of a crime is now deemed treasonous. I suspect the founders would be rolling in their graves at the notion.
If a spirited defense is only acceptable for those deemed "worthy" of defense then we are making a mockery of justice.
205
posted on
12/15/2003 9:01:05 PM PST
by
tcuoohjohn
(Follow The Money)
To: kitkat
Chad, the Pope is NOT infallible except for very limited things. In fact, the areas are so rare that I cannot even name one for you. But he is NOT infallible in everything. Thinking the Pope is infallible in everything is a common misunderstanding by those without Catholic teaching.Papal infallibility is one of the great differences between Catholicism and Protestantism. I can say that, as a kid from a Catholic family who chose to become a Baptist on his own, but that is really digressing here :0)
I was merely trying to point out that one can disagree with something the Pope has decided, and that does not automatically make one an anti-catholic bigot.
Tossing around the "Bigot" label because one disagrees with a Papal decision is not always right. I hope you understand where I am coming from :0)
206
posted on
12/15/2003 9:03:28 PM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
(What am I rebelling against? Well, what do ya got?)
To: Senator Pardek
can we take a poll: how many FReepers had to read the story to guess WHICH former AG that might be?
207
posted on
12/15/2003 9:03:36 PM PST
by
EDINVA
To: CyberCowboy777
LOL
208
posted on
12/15/2003 9:04:15 PM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
(What am I rebelling against? Well, what do ya got?)
To: squidly
Ramsey Clark, the biggest throwback of the throwback Johnson administration. The next Democratic president after Johnson was Carter then Clinton. The only thing worse than that was the cretins they ran in the election years they lost.
The only kind of appointments Lyndon made was of the the kind of people he could control. As long as Ramsey Clark had a meal ticket from LBJ he was quite agreeable.
209
posted on
12/15/2003 9:04:24 PM PST
by
oyez
(Scratch one mad dog.)
To: dubyaismypresident
ROTFL... Sorry, I'll remember that next time. ;0)
210
posted on
12/15/2003 9:04:46 PM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
(What am I rebelling against? Well, what do ya got?)
To: Senator Pardek
Isn't David Duke an attorney? He could be co-counsel. He's likely to be at the conference also, seeing as how he's frequently feted and hosted by the Islamonazis.
211
posted on
12/15/2003 9:05:26 PM PST
by
Stultis
To: tcuoohjohn
I am amazed at the idea that a vigorous defense of someone accused of a crime is now deemed treasonous. I suspect the founders would be rolling in their graves at the notion. It's the cumulative record that is being weighed.
To: Chad Fairbanks
***Ditto. I will also never understand those who think the Vatican is infallible.***
I'm glad to hear it, Chad. Now I can continue to enjoy your posts.
213
posted on
12/15/2003 9:06:39 PM PST
by
kitkat
To: dubyaismypresident
I only jumped in to point out that a pope can say something dumb without invalidating the beliefs of a billion peopleTrue enough, and I never said it did. In fact, I know many Catholics that disagrees with the Holy See on this issue :0)
And as far as the thin-skinned thing, I know there has been a lot of Catholic-bashing on FR, but legitimate criticism isn't Catholic-bashing. :0)
Have a good night!
214
posted on
12/15/2003 9:06:40 PM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
(What am I rebelling against? Well, what do ya got?)
To: Mo1
I also don't expect the Pope to say .. Kill the SOB But, maaaan, wouldn't it be cool if he did? ;0)
215
posted on
12/15/2003 9:07:19 PM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
(What am I rebelling against? Well, what do ya got?)
To: Lady In Blue
As a mackeral snapper myself, I second your comments with unabashed fervor.
Dominus Vobiscum
216
posted on
12/15/2003 9:07:38 PM PST
by
tcuoohjohn
(Follow The Money)
To: kitkat
Good :0) I just wanted to clear up the whole "Bigot" thing. I recognize that while some threads on FR turn into Catholic-bashing threads, I've never been one of those posters. :0)
217
posted on
12/15/2003 9:09:11 PM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
(What am I rebelling against? Well, what do ya got?)
To: Chad Fairbanks
LOL .. yes it would .. and yes, I would be shocked
But he ain't gonna say it .. no matter what
218
posted on
12/15/2003 9:09:22 PM PST
by
Mo1
(House Work, If you do it right , will kill you!)
To: Mo1
Hmmm...maybe I should run for Pope someday ;0)
219
posted on
12/15/2003 9:10:24 PM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
(What am I rebelling against? Well, what do ya got?)
To: Senator Pardek
I wonder what the Johnson family has thought of crazy man's antics..I mean..how could LBJ appoint such a lunatic..or did he get sick after his term..he was there with iran claiming sympathy for the hostage takers in 1979...has taken common cause with foreign foes against the USA since..sad to say no straight jacket has held him..lol.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 321-332 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson