Posted on 12/15/2003 1:17:02 PM PST by yankeedame
The Mac @ 20
Happy Birthday, Mac!
Quentin Hardy
12.15.03, 12:00 PM ET
It ought to be dead by now, beset by time and big competitors. Be grateful it isn't. For in all its iterations since it was introduced to the world in January 1984--the Macintosh, then such sequels as the Mac II, PowerBook, Power Mac, iMac--the world's most persistent computer brand has done the most for all computer users. Not through market share, of course--bad business decisions, bad luck and bad behavior from friends and foes ruled that out years ago. But the Mac, always built by the rule that good design is paramount, has challenged and inspired everyone in the digital world.
The most famous innovation, of course, is the original Mac's graphical user interface, which Microsoft (nasdaq: MSFT - news - people ) Windows appeared to copy over several generations. Microsoft, which denied this from 1985 on, paid Apple Computer (nasdaq: AAPL - news - people ) an undisclosed sum in 1997 to end allegations that it had poached Apple. Never mind that Apple was itself accused of poaching the interface from Xerox (nyse: XRX - news - people ). The Mac was key in the advent of desktop publishing, too. Wi-Fi, now one of the hottest things in networking, got its start in 1989, when Apple engineers were looking for a way to wirelessly connect the Mac to a printer.
Then there is the PDA. Maybe everybody was wrong to laugh at that Mac cousin, the Newton, which never took off but lingered on the market until the spring of 1998. Apple's hit product iPod is the first piece of hardware expressly built for the "digital lifestyle" (with the Mac at the hub) theme announced by Apple Chief Executive Steve Jobs in 2001. Gateway (nyse: GTW - news - people ), Dell (nasdaq: DELL - news - people ) and Hewlett-Packard (nyse: HPQ - news - people ) now talk about selling consumer gear and PC-centered media products, but Mac was there first. Even OS X, the Mac's newest operating system, is based on a Unix computing approach only now hitting PCs through the migration of Linux to the desktop.
How could one product line bring so much to the industry? Because the Mac team has always understood that really great design makes an object seem like a hitherto-unknown part of oneself, a new way to encounter and express yourself in the outside world. How that happens may be impossible to pin down, but you know it when you see it, and it is inspirational, it is emotional. PCs are functional, even well made, but they do not inspire.
Great design is not just about surfaces; it runs from deep function through outside aura. Engineers felt inspired by the guts of the first Mac, and its close ties of hardware and software that have always made it far easier to configure and upgrade. Ordinary users fell for touches like the smiling Mac icon that came on as the computer warmed up, as if the machine was relating to you, promising to be along in a minute. They liked the straightforward shape, with a desktop terminal almost the same length and width as a piece of paper. Marketers were spellbound by the first Mac ad, that famous "1984" spot where the sprinting woman threw a hammer through Big Brother's (read: Big Blue's) droning rant. It showed nationally once, but it still elicits passion.
One more thing about great design: It comes from a single vision, not a committee. The PC is Microsoft's operating system, Intel (nasdaq: INTC - news - people ) chips and a bunch of stuff from nameless factories in Taiwan, all hung together. It is a committee product. The Mac, even with chips manufactured by other sources, comes from a few people at Apple, sharing a common vision.
Most of the Mac's life, whoever was on team Mac could count on Steve Jobs standing behind them, telling them that their latest idea sucks, ranting that they'll have to do better. Love the guy or hate him, we have all benefited from his tyranny.
Too much at times is made of Jobs' genius, as when the iMac came out in several colors. A computer that wasn't beige! What a visionary! Really, this was more an indictment of Silicon Valley, 20 years into home computers, than a testimony to Steve's big brain. He did not always get it right the first time, either--the first Mac lacked enough memory, was a commercial failure and led not only to layoffs but to Jobs' own ouster in 1985. 2000's PowerMacG4 Cube was also a high-priced flop. But more than most, he learned and adapted, and drove his teams to improve--over the long haul, great design can handle the odd failure, but not the failure to learn.
Happy 20th, Mac! Take the day off, team. Chill, Steve. Just come back to work tomorrow.
Funny how the prices never change, but the MAC is always more expensive, no matter what year you pick.
I have seen that several times. What's funny - I find it difficult to believe that guy every really used a Mac - instead coming up with this idea through skimming a few tech help boards and ancient machines - A lot of the problems he mentioned either have never existed or have not existed since some of the very earliest versions of the OS. If we are going back that far to find something that serious to gripe about - lets look at the Windows versions from the same time frame. Oh - wait - some of these problems were killed off before any of the more "mature" versions of Windows were even released.... And no, I'm not trying to convince anyone the Macintosh platform is the one they should use. I gave that up quite some time ago. All I will say is - I am forced to use Windows, and I choose to use Macintosh for everything I can. At work, 80% of my work gets done on an 11 year old PowerMac 7200/75 (Yes, 75 Mhz), mostly because that machine crashes FAR less than the Windows machine in my band room (Just over 2 year old 550Mhz P3, Windows 98 SE). I just did a lot of updating and house-cleaning on the Windows machine - it is now down to crashing/freezing 3-5 times per week. The old 7200/75 has crashed/frozen 2 times in the last 8 months. I hate how slow the old Mac is - but I love how reliable it is. Use what you want, just don't gripe if it doesn't work.
fighting...peeing in punchbowls...a Jedi craves not these things.
Please put me on your ping list!
Except for the millions of users who don't use Microsoft OS (Linux, Lindows, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, Mac, etc).
I have a feeling that the mac hype might have something behind it. I few of my friends started buying macs, and they now swear by them. I even pointed out that some of the accessories could be bought from a third party for cheaper(i.e. external firewire drives), but they stick with Apple because they claim it is more reliable. Personally, I don't have too many problems with Windows, but that is because I am a computer geek and assemble/tweak all my computers (hell, I even took apart my laptop to teach it a lesson). I've tried linux, but it didn't strike me as something I had the time to learn.
Never called for technical assistance on any of my MACs.
I'm a simple user. Don't want to attend training or learn what is going on inside the machine.
I'll not make this mistake again.
When will G-6s be out?
MacRumor's Buyer's Guide can help you out there.
True enough, but these users don't make up a critical mass. Users of Microsoft's OS do. By sheer dent of their numbers, they define how the internet is fashioned (by chosing a certain browser over others), and select most of its standards. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, but if an MS OS comes along which compromises the freedom of the current internet (requiring hardwired ID codes for hardware, creating an opening for governments to require internet IDs for financial transactions [thus permitting them to track users, block access across borders, etc.], and so on), those who champion the use of the classical PC will have foisted a monster on all of us. Unlike the alternate OSs you list, Longhorn is rumored to contain many such features.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.