Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran wants Saddam tried in international court
Reuters ^ | 12/15/03

Posted on 12/15/2003 6:23:58 AM PST by areafiftyone

TEHRAN, Dec 15 (Reuters) - Iran's government said on Monday it was preparing a criminal complaint to present at any international court that may try Saddam Hussein over the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq war.

"The Foreign Ministry has taken some measures on this issue and has collected the necessary documents. I hope we can defend Iranians' rightful demands at a proper place," government spokesman Abdollah Ramazanzadeh told a news conference.

Around 300,000 Iranians were killed in the eight-year war, including thousands in chemical weapons attacks by the Iraqi army. U.S.-led troops ousted Saddam, the Iraqi dictator, in April and captured him on Saturday.

Ramazanzadeh said that while the Iraqi people have priority in trying Saddam, "that doesn't negate the rights of others for filing a suit at international circles against him".

"We naturally want him to stand trial at a fair international court and such a court should look into the crimes of this dictator," he added.

Iraqi Governing Council members on Sunday indicated Saddam would be put on trial in Iraq under a new tribunal system set up last week to try Saddam and fellow Baathist leaders.

Iran has longstanding war reparations claims of tens of billions of dollars against Iraq for the bloody war which Saddam launched in 1980 with an invasion of his eastern neighbour.

LIMITED PROSPECTS

But Iran's prospects of trying Saddam in an international court are limited.

The International Court for Justice in The Hague, the United Nations' highest court, can resolve disputes between countries but is not a criminal tribunal with the power to try individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity or genocide.

The International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague is also not an option. It only has the power to try war crimes committed after the court came into force in 2002 and neither Iran nor Iraq -- or the United States, Russia or China for that matter -- has signed up to it.

Legal experts said Iran's only other options would be to try to extradite Saddam to stand trial in Iran or to provide evidence to an Iraqi tribunal trying Saddam.

Iran's conservative newspapers, full of conspiracy theories about Saddam's capture, expressed doubts that Iraq's U.S.-led occupiers would grant him an open trial.

"Will they allow Saddam to be brought to justice as a war criminal in an open court so that he can freely talk about his crimes against the Muslims and those who encouraged him?" the Tehran Times asked.

Iran has long held that the United States and western European countries armed Saddam against Iran which, after the 1979 Islamic revolution, was perceived as a bigger regional threat by the West.

"It should become clear at such an (international) court who were those who mobilised this dictator to create turmoil in the region," Ramazanzadeh said.

Iran has welcomed the capture of Saddam, described by Ramazanzadeh as "one of the biggest criminals of this century."

"Saddam's humiliating surrender shows that if anyone does not yield to his own nation he must surrender to foreign powers in a humiliating fashion," he said.


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: elvisbinladen; hagueicc; iran; iraq; iraqijustice; saddam

1 posted on 12/15/2003 6:23:58 AM PST by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Who gives a rat's azz? LOL!
2 posted on 12/15/2003 6:24:53 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
OK, Give us Bin Laden and we'll talk about it.
3 posted on 12/15/2003 6:25:14 AM PST by Bringbackthedraft (Hillary 2004 Its in the works for sure, just watch! She is the best they can do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
ping
4 posted on 12/15/2003 6:26:02 AM PST by Pan_Yans Wife ("Your joy is your sorrow unmasked." --- GIBRAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Iran wants Saddam tried in international court

France and Germany want Iraqui rebuilding contracts, but that's not gonna happen (either).

Can't blame the Iranians for wanting a piece of Saddam's hide, but the only way they might have had any say in what happens to him is if they had joined the coalition of liberators.

5 posted on 12/15/2003 6:32:02 AM PST by Kenton (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenton
France and Germany want Iraqui rebuilding contracts, but that's not gonna happen (either).

If the debt that was incurred, under the rule of Saddam is forgiven by nations such as France and Germany, then the rebuilding contracts will be issued in response.

6 posted on 12/15/2003 6:33:34 AM PST by Pan_Yans Wife ("Your joy is your sorrow unmasked." --- GIBRAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
Of course they do. Heh, your comment was my thought just after reading the headline.
7 posted on 12/15/2003 6:35:45 AM PST by bluefish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
I want a weekend in Aruba with Kirsten Dunst in her cheerleading outfit but I ain't getting that, either.
8 posted on 12/15/2003 6:43:41 AM PST by Snake65 (Osama Bin Decomposing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenton
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1040564/posts
9 posted on 12/15/2003 6:50:39 AM PST by Pan_Yans Wife ("Your joy is your sorrow unmasked." --- GIBRAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kenton
Can't blame the Iranians for wanting a piece of Saddam's hide

That is not what this gambit is about. The goal is to blame the West because the Iranian regime is committed to jihad, ie., the supremacy of Islam throughout the world and the utter defeat of the West.

"Will they allow Saddam to be brought to justice as a war criminal in an open court so that he can freely talk about his crimes against the Muslims and those who encouraged him?" the Tehran Times asked.

Iran has long held that the United States and western European countries armed Saddam against Iran which, after the 1979 Islamic revolution, was perceived as a bigger regional threat by the West.

"It should become clear at such an (international) court who were those who mobilised this dictator to create turmoil in the region," Ramazanzadeh said.

10 posted on 12/15/2003 7:31:34 AM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft
OK, Give us Bin Laden and we'll talk about it.

Thats' the ticket! :))

11 posted on 12/15/2003 8:48:50 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
The Iranian people, we have to remember, have a real, legitimate beef with Saddam. He attacked in 1980 w/o any provocation, setting in motion a war that lasted about 8 years and killed untold numbers of people. The Iranians were down to drafting children at one point. (The ayatollahs committed many war crimes in the course of the war as well... but that's no reason to give Saddam a pass).

I think the morally correct answer is to allow Iranian prosecutors to participate in the Iraqi trial of Saddam, to present their evidence, and to question him.

As far as the Iranian conspiracy theories about US support to Saddam, the US did supply intelligence in exchenge for various concessions from Iraq. Our nexus of interest was opposition to the ayatollahs; let's bear in mind that they were in 1980 and still in 2003 the greatest state sponsor of terrorism, so anything that weakened them made (and makes) the world a safer place for regular people. We didn't significantly arm Saddam, although France did, including direct support for his nuclear weapons programs. Name a sophisticated weapon employed in the Iran-Iraq war that came from the US... only Iran had them. The sophisticated weapons in the Iraqi arsenal were all Soviet or French, including WMDs. I'm not aware of a US aircraft, helicopter, or firearm in Iraqi service during or subsequent to this period, although a renegade American individual, Dr Gerald Bull, did design artillery for Saddam. But say he is in indicator of US support (I believe he was stripped of US citizenship?) is like saying the US supported the Taliban because John Walker Lindh fought for them.

Of course, who thinks Saddam has any incentive to tell the truth? He's beat, he's caught, and he's inevitably going to die. Hard to reach him with much at this point.

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F
12 posted on 12/15/2003 9:32:49 AM PST by Criminal Number 18F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft
Give us Bin Laden and we'll talk about it


13 posted on 12/15/2003 9:38:06 AM PST by ASA Vet ("Those who know don't talk, those who talk don't know.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson