Skip to comments.
Italy Bans Donor Sperm and Eggs
BBC News ^
| December 11, 2003
| None Given
Posted on 12/14/2003 7:38:56 PM PST by Aliska
Italy bans donor sperm and eggs
Italy's Senate has overwhelmingly approved a law which bans the use of donor sperm, eggs or surrogate mothers. It also limits the right to artificial fertilisation to "heterosexual couples in stable relationships", excluding gay couples and single women.
The bill, one of the most restrictive in Europe, has drawn support and criticism from across the party lines.
BBC Rome correspondent Frances Kennedy says that the bill has pitted Catholics against liberals and men against women.
The legislation, passed in the Senate by 169 votes to 90 on Thursday, will now be sent back to the lower house of the parliament for minor adjustments.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: artificial; insemination; italy; sperm; spermbanks; spermdonors; surrogate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Dr. Dean was talking about this today, and he thought it was a bad thing. I thought it was probably a good thing. For discussion.
1
posted on
12/14/2003 7:38:57 PM PST
by
Aliska
To: Aliska
This should be law in America. However, it's a cash cow and I don't see it ever being overturned.
2
posted on
12/14/2003 7:41:25 PM PST
by
cyborg
(far right extremist american...........)
To: cyborg; Salvation
No, I don't think it will fly here which is a shame.
Salvation: Catholics might find this of interest if you want to ping them. It is more general news, but I could have posted it in the religion forum.
3
posted on
12/14/2003 7:43:54 PM PST
by
Aliska
To: Aliska
Well, you can have sperm, sperm, sperm, sausage, sperm, eggs, sperm and toast... that's not got much sperm in it.
I don't like sperm!
4
posted on
12/14/2003 7:45:08 PM PST
by
dead
(I used to believe in a lot of things. All of it! Now I believe only in dynamite.)
To: Aliska
Would that it were so here.
5
posted on
12/14/2003 7:53:35 PM PST
by
skr
(Pro-life from cradle to grave)
To: skr
It probably didn't go as far as the Catholic church would have liked as I believe they forbid artificial insemination altogether, but the legislation is more humane and responsible than here and elsewhere.
I don't know what it is with us and why we insist on certain rights that aren't good for everyone.
6
posted on
12/14/2003 8:02:18 PM PST
by
Aliska
To: dead
No as a reply it would be more spam sperm etc. etc. and I'm glad Italy has taken some steps... the ban on deceased spouse sperm is not correct in my view.
7
posted on
12/14/2003 8:02:45 PM PST
by
noodler
To: dead
"Italy Bans Donor Sperm and Eggs What? No more green eggs and sperm?
To: cyborg
Italy's Senate has overwhelmingly approved a law which bans the use of donor sperm, eggs or surrogate mothers.You are aware that this would mean that infertile couples would be prohibited from having children, aren't you?
9
posted on
12/14/2003 8:07:57 PM PST
by
Hodar
(With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
To: Hodar
No, the title is a little misleading. Only heterosexual couples in stable relationships will be permitted to use artificial insemination.
10
posted on
12/14/2003 8:12:25 PM PST
by
Aliska
To: Hodar
It also limits the right to artificial fertilisation to "heterosexual couples in stable relationships", excluding gay couples and single women.
*** They're covered. I have a personal opinion about IVF clinics in that I do not believe in them, they take a lot of people's money, and they take away the attention from adoption and lessening abortion. Actually, they are involved in a lot of abortions since they freeze embryos and can't use them all.
11
posted on
12/14/2003 8:13:14 PM PST
by
cyborg
(far right extremist american...........)
To: Aliska
"why we insist on certain rights that aren't good for everyone."
I think it is related to the concept called "freedom", and the hope that people will use good judgment.
To: John Beresford Tipton
Yeah.. "why we insist on certain rights that aren't good for everyone."
Doubleplus good..
To: Aliska
What a stupid, irrational ,and backward law
14
posted on
12/14/2003 8:32:19 PM PST
by
WackyKat
To: WackyKat
I don't think it is "backward" to have as normal, traditional family environment for children as possible. Children deserve a male father and female mother in a mature, stable relationship, preferably marriage. I guess that makes me backward.
15
posted on
12/14/2003 8:43:57 PM PST
by
Aliska
To: Aliska
Perhaps you missed that the law also bans donor sperm and eggs? If one of spouses is infertile, this means that they cannot have a child that is biologically connected to at least one of them
Exactly how does that promote family values?
And as to the restriction of fertility treatments to married couples, do you understand that unmarried fertile people can have all the children they want by having sex?
Do you want to make unmarried sex illegal?
I bet you'd like make birth control illegal too, wouldn't you?
16
posted on
12/14/2003 8:57:04 PM PST
by
WackyKat
To: Aliska
Critics have called it medieval and say it could lead to a ban on abortion.Perish the thought!
Now, let me get this straight: this law will prohibit donor eggs and surrogacy, but notabortion? Apparently, the artificial creation of life in Italy is a greater crime than its artificial destruction.
To: WackyKat
I don't think donating sperm or eggs is a good idea personally. I wouldn't do it and I advised my son not to do it.
Exactly how does that promote family values?
You have to draw the line somewhere. Childless marriages are not the end of the world.
do you understand that unmarried fertile people can have all the children they want by having sex?
I have six illegitimate grandchildren to prove it. I would have wanted better for them.
Do you want to make unmarried sex illegal?
Frankly, I think it would make for a more healthy, stable society. You think it is a good thing what we have now? I think fornication used to be illegal in some places. I think it ought to be illegal for someone like Strom Thurmond to fornicate with his parents' 16-year-old domestic servant.
I bet you'd like make birth control illegal too, wouldn't you?
Personally, I'd make sperm illegal.
I don't know if I'd want birth control completely illegal, but I think it is the cause of a lot of problems in our modern society that were far, far less 50 years ago.
I used different forms of birth control. Some of it was not a good thing at all. There were negative consequences, such as infection from IUD, other things. I think we are too obsessed with sex in our society today. There is more to life than sex and birth control so we can have more sex without babies.
18
posted on
12/14/2003 9:12:21 PM PST
by
Aliska
To: Tabi Katz
There are some in Italy who would like to ban abortion, but there is not enough political support for that. Why I don't know.
19
posted on
12/14/2003 9:14:34 PM PST
by
Aliska
To: Aliska
Do you want to make unmarried sex illegal? Frankly, I think it would make for a more healthy, stable society. You think it is a good thing what we have now? I think fornication used to be illegal in some places. I think it ought to be illegal for someone like Strom Thurmond to fornicate with his parents' 16-year-old domestic servant.
I bet you'd like make birth control illegal too, wouldn't you?
Personally, I'd make sperm illegal.
That someone with your ideas would support this law only reinforces my opinion of it.
By the way,Strom's affair with the black maid was illegal; it was a violation of the miscegenation law.Those laws were struck down as unconstitutional insults to human dignity and freedom. I guess you'd like to reinstate them, too
20
posted on
12/14/2003 9:21:30 PM PST
by
WackyKat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson