To: texasflower
Here's a DU take on it believe it or not:
This could be a disaster for Bush.
If Saddam stands trial, it could turn out that he could make a case that anything that Bush did was equal or worse than what he did. He could expose his own arming with WMDs by the US.
This is sick
To: Graybeard58
This could be a disaster for Bush.
DU words - NOT MINE>
To: Graybeard58
No, if he was armed by the US, who was more likely to do the bulk of it? W who took office in January 2001, or Clinton who had charge of the whole shebang for the previous 8 years?
Or Bush Sr. who INVADED AND ALMOST WENT TO BAGHDAD????
I mean, COME ON. Do the DUers have NO SENSE OF TIME?
271 posted on
12/14/2003 3:39:05 AM PST by
ChemistCat
(Someone you know is alone and sad this holiday season. Find that person and help.)
To: Graybeard58
If Saddam stands trial, it could turn out that he could make a case that anything that Bush did was equal or worse than what he did. He could expose his own arming with WMDs by the US.Sounds like the RAT defense counsel is recommending Sadaam use the 'Miloshevic' card.
286 posted on
12/14/2003 3:43:07 AM PST by
DaBroasta
(Donations to the DNC help fund terrorism)
To: Graybeard58
This is sick
It is sick, but more importantly it's completely bat-**** crazy. Dumb can win elections, stupid can win elections, but completely bat-**** crazy doesn't win elections in America.
308 posted on
12/14/2003 3:48:48 AM PST by
Arkinsaw
(What LSU game? Huh? No idea what you are talking about.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson