To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard; Reagan Man; just mimi; kesg; SpiderMBA; killjoy; prognostigaator; ...
Pinging Mona's list...
(searched, and it wasn't posted anywhere on FR, though this was published 2 days ago.)
2 posted on
12/14/2003 12:20:14 AM PST by
cgk
(Kraut, 1989: We must brace ourselves for disquisitions on peer pressure, adolescent anomie & rage.)
To: cgk
Excellent piece, thanks for posting it!
3 posted on
12/14/2003 1:34:26 AM PST by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Davis is now out of Arnoold's Office , Bout Time!!!!)
To: cgk
So, Congress made a law on a topic that the Constitution says, "Cogress shall make no law...", and the President says congress can make a such a law, and then the SC says, " it's OK for Congress to make a law..." even though the constitution says, "Congress shall make no law...".
Do we have a legitmate government?
All three branches have agreed to openly violate the letter and the spirit of the constituion. I say we have no obligation to submit to arbitary law.
We are now a nation under the rule of tyrants, not the rule of law.
What should be our response?
5 posted on
12/14/2003 11:45:53 AM PST by
rebel
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson