Skip to comments.
Manufacturers pulling workers into political fray
MSNBC News ^
| 12-13-03
| Doug Campbell
Posted on 12/13/2003 9:07:05 AM PST by riri
Toward that end, Pavlansky is launching an unprecedented employee-awareness campaign that will be anchored by the bulletin-board display of a list of "pro-manufacturing" congressional and presidential candidates on one side, and "anti-manufacturing" on the other.
Manufacturers pulling workers into political fray
(Excerpt) Read more at famulus.msnbc.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: freetrade; jobs; manufacturing; offshoring; trade
Dis I excerpt this correctly? hmmm
1
posted on
12/13/2003 9:07:06 AM PST
by
riri
To: A. Pole; harpseal
ping
2
posted on
12/13/2003 9:11:36 AM PST
by
riri
To: oceanview
Ping. I thought this might interest you as it ties into your theory of a lost job turning into a probable dem vote.
3
posted on
12/13/2003 9:15:48 AM PST
by
riri
To: riri; Willie Green
Yes, you linked the article correctly.
Willie,
I saw this one and thought of you.
WFTR
Bill
4
posted on
12/13/2003 10:02:00 AM PST
by
WFTR
(Liberty isn't for cowards)
To: riri; oceanview
I don't think the article has a slant towards either party. It portrays candidates of both parties trying to play into people's fears of job losses but not really giving ideas or visions for improving the situation. The article mentions employers identifying candidates who are likely to help keep jobs in North Carolina, but it doesn't state which party is likely to produce those candidates.
The jobs issue shouldn't be such a strong issue for Democrats. One of the big factors in jobs going overseas is the over-regulation of American business. The Democrats are the driving force for that over-regulation and subsequent job losses. Another big factor in loss of jobs is lawsuit abuse, and the Democrats are typically on the side of the trial lawyers. If we could reduce regulations and lawsuits, more businesses would want to keep manufacturing in the United States. The Republicans need to make this case and show that a lost job should lead to a vote for true conservative candidates.
WFTR
Bill
5
posted on
12/13/2003 10:09:25 AM PST
by
WFTR
(Liberty isn't for cowards)
To: WFTR
I agree but even so, it is hard to compete with people who make a dollar a day (manufacturing) or 15,000 a year (tech).
People will stick with what they know and think of Republicans of the party of the rich and the democrats as the party of the working man.
6
posted on
12/13/2003 10:13:50 AM PST
by
riri
To: WFTR; billbears
The only difference between Democrat Erskine Bowles and Republican Elizabeth Dole on manufacturing-trade issues in the 2002 campaign, Prysby said, was that Bowles professed to wake up thinking about jobs first thing in the morning, while Dole said it kept her up at night.Time to clean house and elect some true America First! representatives.
The present gaggle of political morons is absolutely pathetic.
7
posted on
12/13/2003 10:15:40 AM PST
by
Willie Green
(Go Pat Go!!!)
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: Straight Pipes
Was clinton the most incompetant central planner in history or did he have malicous anti-American intent? My guess is a mixture of both but heavy emphasis on the second.
9
posted on
12/13/2003 10:43:29 AM PST
by
riri
To: riri
If I understand CFR correctly this would be illegal as of August 4, 2004. He could state issues but not candidates.
To: waRNmother.armyboots
If I understand CFR correctly this would be illegal as of August 4, 2004.
I refer to the CFR as the "Incumbant Protection Act" -- odd that the Republicans passed this when they were in control of the presidency and congress.
11
posted on
12/13/2003 12:38:20 PM PST
by
lelio
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson