To: Quix
I found him exceedingly believable. I found it highly unlikely he was even consciously or unconsciously distorting things very significantly and far to ridiculous that he would be lying. I was adding to the original posters comments that "either he saw it, or he didn't." There are other logical things to be added to that list... "he saw it and lied" or "he didn't see it and lied." These also should be included on the list of things to be tested for.
As to being skeptical. I am convinced that UFOs exist because of personal experience. It is very difficult to be skeptical when one has, along with other witnesses, SEEN a classical flying saucer shaped UFO that displayed unnatural flying patterns under circumstances that could not have been faked or caused the witnesses to mistake what they saw.
To: Swordmaker
As to being skeptical. I am convinced that UFOs exist because of personal experience. It is very difficult to be skeptical when one has, along with other witnesses, SEEN a classical flying saucer shaped UFO that displayed unnatural flying patterns under circumstances that could not have been faked or caused the witnesses to mistake what they saw. But that doesn't rule out that IN THIS CASE they were mistaken about the effects of viewing the lighthouse and lightship through the woods while sleepy, tired, and scared at night.
128 posted on
12/12/2003 10:31:46 PM PST by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: Swordmaker
Thanks.
Glad to read of it.
Are you on my UFO ping list or would you like to be?
Can you share a lot more detail of your experience?
133 posted on
12/12/2003 10:35:41 PM PST by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson