Skip to comments.
Innovator hoping to tap underwater power source
Houston Chronicle ^
| December 12, 2003
Posted on 12/12/2003 1:33:36 PM PST by Dog Gone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
1
posted on
12/12/2003 1:33:36 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
This is the same thing as was done @ the end of season one of SeqQuest DSV. The theory is great, the question is how well does it work in the real world.
To: Dog Gone
Well, I don't have the expertise to do the numbers, but if you took out enough power to change or weaken the Gulf Stream--which presumably you would have to do in order to get enough power to change the energy picture--the result would be massive changes in weather patterns, far larger than anything caused by so-called global warming. So how is this an environmentally friendly idea?
3
posted on
12/12/2003 1:41:10 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Dog Gone
But the mechanical challenges are immense. Gear would have to endure rust, fouling from marine growth, nasty weather. Any service crews would need deep-sea dive gear. There are huge questions of cost and reliability.Don't forget transmission of the electricity to shore. Using my newly acquired Professional Engineer's certificate :^D, I concur and declare that the project is not viable with current technology.
4
posted on
12/12/2003 1:43:06 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: Dog Gone
I go out into the Gulfstream oftentimes sport fishing. YOu would be amazed by the strength and flow of the gulfstream. You can be in one place and ten feet away is a river of water moving 6 miles an hour all several miles out in the ocean.
The flow is constant. It is always there. It is always approx. the same speed.
I think the problem though is wear and tear. Everything rots and quickly in salt water.
If you could harness the power of the gulfstream you'd really have something there though.
To: Cicero
My guess is that the total energy in the gulf stream is on a magnitude that would power the earth several times over. A grid powering the Gulf Coast would have minimal impact on the total energy of the stream, and therefore no impact on the immediate environment.
6
posted on
12/12/2003 1:49:05 PM PST
by
Mr. Bird
To: Dog Gone
think of a giant fan with a hole in the center where the hub should be -- deep into the Gulf Stream off the coast of South Florida.And the best part is.....Free Sushi!!!
To: Blood of Tyrants
What is the saying about electricity transport? Like carrying sand cross-country in a burlap sack?
8
posted on
12/12/2003 1:52:02 PM PST
by
Mr. Bird
To: Dog Gone
What is wrong with everyone, on this idea, they have not gotten approval from greenpeas and world wide wildhare foundation.
blades 106 feet underwater, we know that tiny little fish and whales will be endangered by this idea. then we will have kennedy wondering if these will ruin his view from his palm beach sex stop.
9
posted on
12/12/2003 1:53:26 PM PST
by
q_an_a
To: Cicero
but if you took out enough power to change or weaken the Gulf Stream--which presumably you would have to do in order to get enough power to change the energy picture.Please don't presume that...
It makes NO sense to presume that. It's like saying extracting solar power would cause Global Cooling. Or wind farms would disrupt wind patterns. It doesn't work that way...
Damming a river "disrupts" it's normal patterns, but you could get all the energy the world needs from the ocean without disrupting it's patterns.
To: Dog Gone
If we can't make better use of the oceans, then we might as well just drain them.
11
posted on
12/12/2003 1:56:51 PM PST
by
Consort
To: Dog Gone
He'll cause an Ice Age in Europe with that fooling around.
A plus all-in-all compared to the current Global Warming batch session.
12
posted on
12/12/2003 1:58:42 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(Close your tag lines)
To: Mr. Bird
Room temperature superconductors are on the wish list for power companies. If a conductor had zero losses due to the natural resistance of the material, huge transformers and high voltage transmission lines would be a thing of the past.
13
posted on
12/12/2003 2:08:51 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: RightWhale
actually, with the north pole ice melting away for the last 20 years, if it all melts the gulf stream might go away. Otherwise, I do not think it is possible to stop it.
14
posted on
12/12/2003 2:17:22 PM PST
by
Geritol
(Lord willing, there will be a later...)
To: Onelifetogive
One rap about windmills is that they chop up birds.
These will only chop up fish and submarines.
15
posted on
12/12/2003 2:25:56 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: biblewonk
Underwater windmill ping for you.
16
posted on
12/12/2003 2:32:12 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: farmfriend; Ernest_at_the_Beach; sourcery
ping
To: Blood of Tyrants
The gulf stream is only a few miles offshore in Florida.
Several companies make suitable cable to bring the power back to shore. Here is some info I stole from www.kerite.com:

To: e_engineer
What's the purpose of the copper tape?
19
posted on
12/12/2003 2:52:29 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone; biblewonk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson