Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Grig
He might have.

Martin said it was unfathomable that America would put those stipulations on the rebuilding contracts.

A clueless thing to say. What's so unfathomable about America rewarding those who stood by them and excluding those who didn't? Now that Bush seems to be backtracking on this in regards to Canada, I think if the Liberals really wanted to take a stand they should have declined the offer of contracts. Instead they look like whiners.
10 posted on 12/12/2003 8:25:41 AM PST by SB00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: SB00
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20031212/COGEE12/TPColumnists/

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20031212/IBVIEW12/TPColumnists/

Even the leftist leaning columnists at The Mop and Pail tend to agree with you.
13 posted on 12/12/2003 8:36:43 AM PST by albertabound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: SB00
I would also point out that it was unfathomable for the U.S. to expect Canada's support for anything after the U.S. shafted almost the entire Canadian softwood lumber industry in 2001.

This issue, more than anything else, drove a serious wedge between the U.S. and Canada -- mainly because the areas of Canada that were most seriously affected were those areas (Alberta and rural British Columbia) that have traditionally been America's strongest supporters.

14 posted on 12/12/2003 8:39:35 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson