TWA FLIGHT 800: Pilot takes NTSB to court: CIA lied, expert eyewitnesses come forward

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Friday, December 12, 2003 | Jack Cashill

[Victor]

ping for later read

[Ff--150]

No, Ferrat wasn't Lippo, and trying to make the connection how Riady and Lippo fit in. Ron Brown was about to spill the beans on x42 and her husband and Ferrat had some info the feds wanted.

Your salient point about how many witness saw what happened was what I was applauding. I knew people who saw JFK get shot and that was "that Dallas cop on the hill."

Likewise this investigation is going no further as Hillery Clinton is to be planted in 2008 to resume her presidency.

[WhiteGuy]

Our government lies to us.

It's been going on for decades.

I doubt that it will change.

[verity]

You must be a paragon of virtue!

[2nd amendment mama]

Bump to read later.....

[samtheman]

One reason to cover this up is that it wasn't a terrorist strike but some kind of military exercise gone horribly wrong.

[Broadside Joe]

"Likewise this investigation is going no further as Hillery Clinton is to be planted in 2008 to resume her presidency"

All I can say is that I hope you are wrong on both accounts.

[patriot_wes]

You know this story and your quote of the day (I read it twice and I like it) could lead people to think negative thoughts about our government and possibly come to the conclussion that our US government is lying about something and we can't have people knowing thinking that. I think Jim might just have to pull this post.

Copy and paste guys before it's gone!

[DCPatriot]

Two words.

SHOE BOMBER.

[MoodyBlu]

Has the possibility of a meteorite been considered and if so any conclusions?

The month before TWA800 came down, I was vacationing in Ocean City, MD and early one evening witnessed several meteorites over the Atlantic Ocean that appeared to be travelling from the south to north.

I can believe a meteorite or a terrorist missile brought the plane down but have a real tough time with those who direct blame at the Navy. No way you could shut up a boat load of sailors if a Navy ship had anything to do with the tragedy.

MoodyBlu

[Toespi]

Additionally, can you imagine at that time or even now what would have happened to the airline industry had it been generally known that there was the capability to shoot down an airliner? Clinton spent most of his eight years with his head in the sand creating an illusion that the world was safe and at peace through his efforts.

[coloradan]

bump

[RedBloodedAmerican]

Those 2 agencies may be leaving it to the NTSB, in which case you might have inexperienced, and very likely non-aviation persons looking into TWA800.

[JohnEBoy]

Often the simplist answer is correct. This terrorist attack on TWA 800 took place in the summer of '96, exactly when the Clinton re-election campaign was ramping up. Clinton, the great apologist and appeaser did not want to deal with domestic terrorism during the campaign since this would have been a great campaign issue for Bob Dole. So, voila, a theory that a plane climbed 4000 feet after exploding from a center fuel tank. A theory totally in opposition to 270 eyewitnesses.

This is part of the "Clinton Legacy".

[woollyone]

"First Strike" suggests that the Navy shot two missles, but not in an attempt to bring down 800. Rather, the missles were intended to down a twin engine plane w/o a transponder active, which had been trailed by a p3 Orion due to the suspicious nature of the small plane. When the twin engine began to abruptly close toward flight 800, the navy acted by trying to bring it down. The first missle hit the 47, taking out the #3 engine, forward patrs of the right wing and flew throught eh cabin at row 23, exiting the ceiling of the cabin...and the secong one engaged the twin engine at the precise moment it intercepted the 47, underneath the nose of the 47, tearing the nose of the fuselage off. It is suggested that the twin engine plane was loaded with explosives for just such a mid-flight intercept with a jumbo jet and that investigations showed the desire by moos to procure a small plane for such duty.

FWIW, I have asked a few pilots about this theory and if such twin engine prop planes could intercpt a 47 at 13,000 feet during the 47's climbout and every one of them said yes definitely. Never talked to a pilot who believed the gov't theory...not one.

[John W]

I don't think I'd have to look very far to refute your "all the nutters" statements.All means ALL.

[Texas Lizard]

Let's see........hum.........Flight 800, and OK city bombing
...both on Clintoon's watch........whats that I smell? Could it be a coverup ???
- Texas Lizard

[MoodyBlu]

Often the simplist answer is correct. This terrorist attack on TWA 800 took place in the summer of '96, exactly when the Clinton re-election campaign was ramping up. Clinton, the great apologist and appeaser did not want to deal with domestic terrorism during the campaign since this would have been a great campaign issue for Bob Dole. So, voila, a theory that a plane climbed 4000 feet after exploding from a center fuel tank. A theory totally in opposition to 270 eyewitnesses.

OK, but who manipulated who to come to the conclusion the administration reached? I just have a real hard time believing in massive conspiracies to hide the truth. You could not hide efforts by the X42 people to distort the investigation.

MoodyBlu

[4CJ]

If the plane was 10 miles from shore then to that closest person would a 4000 foot climb even come close to looking like a missile?

It's not a even 7° climb, and would hardly be noticable.

[Orangedog]

"The following program was produced by the Central Intelligence Agency," said the narrator at the outset...

I think this one statement should be enough to taint the credibility of the video.